Proposal:Anti-terrorism Act
The nation of Kalemshann whould like to propose a bill condeming terrorism.
The Reson: Terrorism goes against basic human decency and causes undo harm and suffering
The Definition of Terrorism: Any act by group of people to incite fear in an unarmed civillian population by use of force.
The Proposal: Any nation who activaly supports terrorism or commits terrorist acts or sells wepons to a known terrorist group would recieve stiff economic sanctions: If the nation persits in the course of action the nation would suffer penalties up to and including extreme military force.
Thank you.
Like the patriot act?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kûk‡xenisi n!ok‡x'osi xno-k‡xek‡emi.
The state only exists to serve itself.
Racism-the other stupid ideology
Peace, love, and girls with small waists and really big butts!
http://www.sulucas.com/images/steatopygia.jpg
I'm male. Note the pic
of attractive women.
no this one according to the wording could be used to disestablish government.
The Republic of Dovaan enthusiastically supports the excellent proposal. There is no question about it this is absolutely necessary in keeping the world free from the evil grips of terrorism. This will go far in protecting us all and is simply common sense. In fact I would like to compliment Senator Kalemshann on his use of restraint in making sure that force is the absolute last option and trying to work around using it however possible. I encourage all my fellow UN Delegates to endorse this proposal
Letila: This is nothing like the Patriot Act for two reasons. One the Patriot Act is designed to prevent terrorism/find terrorists and this is designed to stop already existing terrorism and its support network. Also the Patriot Act applies to individuals and this applies to governments.
The only goverments this would "deestablish" would be rogue states that fund, support or practice terroism. And no i't not like the patriot act. This does not include laws on how to deal with individual's in a solem nation, just sets rules for the goverments themselves regarding terrorism.
Oh goody. We're going anarchist, so what good does that do against us?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kûk‡xenisi n!ok‡x'osi xno-k‡xek‡emi.
The state only exists to serve itself.
Racism-the other stupid ideology
Peace, love, and girls with small waists and really big butts!
http://www.sulucas.com/images/steatopygia.jpg
I'm male. Note the pic
of attractive women.
Anarcist or not. Support terrorism and a coalition of UN led nations would invade and end the reign of terror.
You dont have to believe in goverment to be obliterated by it :D
no you define it as acts that are made to create fear in the populace, whats the only reason why people listen to the government. Fix your wording, ]according to it arresting people is terrorism.
He's absolutely right. The state is the ultimate terrorist.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kûk‡xenisi n!ok‡x'osi xno-k‡xek‡emi.
The state only exists to serve itself.
Racism-the other stupid ideology
Peace, love, and girls with small waists and really big butts!
http://www.sulucas.com/images/steatopygia.jpg
I'm male. Note the pic
of attractive women.
The Federation of Soltak and the Region of Vulcan's offer their strong support for this proposal. Terrorism in any form is deplorable. The targeting of nonmilitary targets should be condemned and acted against.
My support is yours.
Given that the nation that proposed this was banned, I doubt their intentions. We don't want a patriot act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kûk‡xenisi n!ok‡x'osi xno-k‡xek‡emi.
The state only exists to serve itself.
Racism-the other stupid ideology
Peace, love, and girls with small waists and really big butts!
http://www.sulucas.com/images/steatopygia.jpg
I'm male. Note the pic
of attractive women.
The Federation of Soltak would point out that regardless of the nation's status, their proposal still has its merits. There is a vast difference between the Patriot Act and the Anti-Terrorism proposal.
I ask you, do you like terrorists, Letila? Are you a terrorist? Has your government used or facilitated terrorism?
Why does everyone think Letila supports terrorism? Is it the high level of anarchism? The goofy name?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kûk‡xenisi n!ok‡x'osi xno-k‡xek‡emi.
The state only exists to serve itself.
Racism-the other stupid ideology
Peace, love, and girls with small waists and really big butts!
http://www.sulucas.com/images/steatopygia.jpg
I'm male. Note the pic
of attractive women.
imported_Blacklake
23-12-2003, 05:00
Why does everyone think Letila supports terrorism? Is it the high level of anarchism? The goofy name?
It's the funky letters in your sig.
_________________
http://www.cutandpastescripts.com/cgi-bin/randomimages/randomimages.pl?username=blacklakesig
Sounds like an excellent proposal. However, what one country considers a terrorist group, another may consider an ally. Who will define these "known terrorist groups" will there be an official list?
It's the funky letters in your sig.
That's our language, or one of them.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kûk‡xenisi n!ok‡x'osi xno-k‡xek‡emi.
The state only exists to serve itself.
Racism-the other stupid ideology
Peace, love, and girls with small waists and really big butts!
http://www.sulucas.com/images/steatopygia.jpg
I'm male. Note the pic
of attractive women.
Rebeland, of course there will be an official list from an independent commision on the UN. Since the proposer of this bill has been banned I think I will tkae it up as a proposal.
Terrorism is committed for a purpose,so for many of you here would say when you see people trying to overthrow an oppressive government you would call them terrorists because they're rebels and of course their are going to be friendly-fire from both sides.Everyone who fights for no country are terrorist,someone who fights for a belief is a terrorist.You see terrorism has many meanings and forms,try to think people before agreeing to this act.
Collaboration
23-12-2003, 11:37
You would have to be able to prove that a nation intentionally harbored or supported terrorists, before you could fairly punish them.
Some nations are trying without success to eradicate terror cells within their borders. They should be assisted in these efforts, not punsished because they have failed.
Catholic Europe
23-12-2003, 12:07
Well, I don't think that it's going to go through now considering that the nation who proposed it has been deleted.
Take away Terrorist. Not only do i support this proposal. I will endorse it, by condeming all terrorist in my country (if there is any) they will get life/ death penalty. Thank you for such a great idea
Oppressed Possums
24-12-2003, 18:06
Anarcist or not. Support terrorism and a coalition of UN led nations would invade and end the reign of terror.
You dont have to believe in goverment to be obliterated by it :D
Doesn't war fit the bill of creating terror? It seems self-defeating.
Well, I don't think that it's going to go through now considering that the nation who proposed it has been deleted.
What about End Barbaric Punishments :?:
Li Kam States
24-12-2003, 20:26
I like the idea, but I don't like the wording. Any clever lawyer could twist this and destabalise a decent government.
Oppressed Possums
24-12-2003, 21:19
Well, I don't think that it's going to go through now considering that the nation who proposed it has been deleted.
What about End Barbaric Punishments :?:
I think it is meaningless.
Simply, for us terrorism = tourism.
'Terror tourism' is an increasingly important industry in my country, it brings my people wealth. Not to mention the revenue generated by government arms sales, which is neglible in comparison with the economic damage caused by acts of terror, which are mostly directed against other countries anyway. An anti-terrorism resolution such as the one proposed would save lives elsewhere, but thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of livelihoods would be lost in Andrax.