NationStates Jolt Archive


Sexual Intercoruse

14-12-2003, 01:29
Would you allow sexual intercourse in public in your country?
14-12-2003, 01:30
You need to get laid.
14-12-2003, 01:32
Wow, you need help!
14-12-2003, 01:45
Yes, with restrictions.
No one under a certain age as a participant or audience member
consentual
sex as an art form

and yes, strippers are an art form
and nope I'm not a guy
Oppressed Possums
14-12-2003, 01:51
As long as people don't do anything "obscene" then I see nothing wrong with it. (Y'know park benches are not toys)
14-12-2003, 01:59
Its hard to have sex and there not be anything obscene about it.
14-12-2003, 02:03
In my empire is grounds for a date with the whipping post. We will not allow immoratity in go unpunished.
14-12-2003, 05:55
QUOTE FROM THREAD TITLE:
"Would you allow Sexual Intercoruse in public in your country?"


:roll: Maybe you should stop typing with one hand long enough to realize it is called "sexual intercourse" not "intercoruse".

Then again, 'spanking the monkey' is maybe the most action you will see for a long time. :lol:
Oppressed Possums
14-12-2003, 18:24
Have you ever brought candy to school and the teacher says "I hope you brought enough for everybody"?

I think this is the same situation.
14-12-2003, 18:26
---Post deleted by NationStates Moderators---
Nevermoore
14-12-2003, 18:39
Nevermoore doesn't care what its people do on their free time or where they do it as long as it doesn't go against the government. As long as they don't block any sidewalks, roads, or any other important paths they can have sex wherever.

Nevermoore's Ambassador to the United Nations:
Emelia Hearting

OOC: No... just no.
14-12-2003, 19:09
N.E. Prussia's Ambassador to the UN:

What the $@!#!?!?
14-12-2003, 19:13
Not at all!!! Public is public and allowing such a risque act to be public only further tells parents that they have no right to decide when their children should be old enough to see this sort of thing OR you are telling people who do not want to see the rest of your nasty, disgusting bodies that they do not have a choice and deal with it. Keep yourself covered and keep your sex behind your closed door.
14-12-2003, 21:59
For some reason I pictured this thread starting out as "Dear Penthouse Forum"...
14-12-2003, 22:04
Most people are ugly.

Ugly people have sex.

The thought of seeing ugly people having sex makes me ill.

Conclusion: This is bad. For the same reasons Aldecia banned full nudity in public.
14-12-2003, 22:04
The Global Market
14-12-2003, 22:22
"Because my politicians are grossed out."

Hardly a good reason to restrict individual liberties, Mr. Hitler.
Doobadoobee
14-12-2003, 22:31
why should it not be allowed, its natural and anyway children are the future and they come from sexual intercourse
Galdon3
14-12-2003, 22:34
Have you ever brought candy to school and the teacher says "I hope you brought enough for everybody"?

I think this is the same situation.

My sentiments exactly.
Collaboration
14-12-2003, 23:40
We set aside corners of parks, rights-of-way and cul-de-sacs for this purpose. A (fairly expensive) annual license is required, which enriches our coffers.

We also then charge a fee for public viewing, and broadcast on Pay-per-View. More income, and everyone's happy.
The Global Market
15-12-2003, 01:12
We set aside corners of parks, rights-of-way and cul-de-sacs for this purpose. A (fairly expensive) annual license is required, which enriches our coffers.

We also then charge a fee for public viewing, and broadcast on Pay-per-View. More income, and everyone's happy.

:lol:
Komokom
15-12-2003, 01:20
For some reason I pictured this thread starting out as "Dear Penthouse Forum"...

:D Lol, I alomst died laughing when I heard this one! A classic! Hey, is it just me or are there less no votes then yes votes? Scary stuff! Must be an awful lot of sticky keyboards out there... :shock:
The Nintendo Emerates
15-12-2003, 02:27
The Nintendo Emerates say yes, we do have public surveillance cameras; might as well put them to good use and make some money on the world wide web :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: !
The Nintendo Emerates
15-12-2003, 02:29
double post...
Oppressed Possums
15-12-2003, 02:54
For some reason I pictured this thread starting out as "Dear Penthouse Forum"...

:D Lol, I alomst died laughing when I heard this one! A classic! Hey, is it just me or are there less no votes then yes votes? Scary stuff! Must be an awful lot of sticky keyboards out there... :shock:

As I just checked, yes - 27, no - 26
imported_Uncle Adolf
15-12-2003, 08:47
The question is, why would someone want to do it in public ?
Moontian
15-12-2003, 11:28
yes 31, no 28
I guess that people want to see this sort of thing.

In Moontian, all the students are in a boarding school until they finish, so it wouldn't matter if people were busy in the streets. Anyway, students are taught all about that sort of thing in their early teens in Moontian, and get practice in school.
15-12-2003, 13:26
I guess I would have to agree. As long as they arent blocking sidewalks or taking up a lot of space in parks and other public domains, can I say no? All assuming they are legal adults, which is 18 in my country and are both consenting. I do find it very amusing that what is considered a most natural and basic act has become nasty. Where are your guys’ minds at?!

Okay.. all that aside. I cant really say no still unless it becomes a bigger problem. I am not going to tell a pair of people that want to do it in the park because little Jimmy’s parents dont want him to see it. 1 little kids rights are not greater than two other people rights. If his parents dont like it, keep the kid inside, the nazis. Little Jimmy probably already know what he is seeing anyways so they are freaking out over nothing. Might as well educate him now and not let him go do something stupid like get an STD.
15-12-2003, 13:32
No, on the grounds that ugly nasty dirty people might decide to do it in public and then i'd have to cut through the red tape of having them shot.
15-12-2003, 13:34
Limited to places that may cause problems such as streets, malls, and public transports.
15-12-2003, 17:56
This whole idea though assumes that we WANT our citizens to have freedoms and rights.
If it is good for the economy, then we are all for it. But sex in public is a distraction that my slaves... er... I mean... citizens, do not need.
If the citizens of Lemurlands have enough energy at the end of their workday to even consider something along those lines, then they are not working hard enough.


- Patrick, Emperor of Lemurlands
Catholic Europe
15-12-2003, 18:09
I would not allow sexual intercourse in public in my country.
15-12-2003, 18:31
Donde Estampon encourages the liberal freedom of adults to express themselves openly and freely. However, we impose strict modesty and discretionary laws to provide an avenue to allow such activity and still maintain a reasonable means of curtailing disproportionate and inappropriate behavior in order to promote a fair, sensible and responsible society.

Si se siente el derecho, hágalo.
16-12-2003, 03:19
Yeah. It would hardly be proper to have people having sex in the middle of the street. That may cause problems with traffic in a country that is dependant on motor vehicles.
16-12-2003, 14:29
We of Chumba think, that No, we would not allow sex in public, reason? Well, the last thing I think any one wants to see is hairy bobbing man ass, what about subjects on social welfare, and human rights issues, that seems more important to something we do in our own homes, and the person that said you need to get laid, was right.



Envoy to his holiness Emperor William VII

Monty Smith (some what confused to why this subject was posted?)
16-12-2003, 17:19
i can imagin some people wanting to have sex in public but i cant imagin that i wanna see them doing it under my nose :roll:
16-12-2003, 17:25
Love life don't sex it up!
16-12-2003, 17:49
Hmm...

Apparently, many people do already practise intercourse in public, and there is something of a cult grown around what they call... well, 'dogging'. It's very odd...

And anyone in a sixth-form must have seen a few people acting intimately in complete lack of seclusion. One couple remained blissfully unaware of their surroundings, the relative seclusion of the busy quadrangle, as she tossed him off industriously. Charmed, I'm sure.

I won't support public sexual intercourse, but I have no problem with 'viewing optional' intercourse in private, designated areas - people may watch sex in these areas. And... well, people tend to turn a blind eye to other people having sex in some dark, obscure area of the woods at night, where few people would legitimately go.

- Jordan, Monarch of Archaeus
16-12-2003, 19:05
In Vergeltung, public nudity is banned. If you can get around that law, go ahead. Just don't hold up traffic.
16-12-2003, 19:19
In Vergeltung, public nudity is banned. If you can get around that law, go ahead. Just don't hold up traffic.

I don't think I'd really want to, thanks! What was the rationale behind banning it?

- Jordan, Monarch of Archaeus
20-12-2003, 08:40
Most people are ugly.

Ugly people have sex.

The thought of seeing ugly people having sex makes me ill.

Conclusion: This is bad. For the same reasons Aldecia banned full nudity in public.

Amen. Definately would scare the crap out of tourists.
20-12-2003, 09:27
Of course not! The majority of my nation is conservative and would NEVER stand for such unmoral acts to be done in public! :shock:
Nyborg
20-12-2003, 11:42
If I new what "intercoruse" was, I might consider it... :shock:
20-12-2003, 20:57
Most people are ugly.

Ugly people have sex.

The thought of seeing ugly people having sex makes me ill.

Conclusion: This is bad. For the same reasons Aldecia banned full nudity in public.

Amen. Definately would scare the crap out of tourists.

Now only goodlooking people can copulate in public? I shall not tolerate such prejudice in our Empire. Everything is relative... even the definition of ugly is.

Sexual intercourse in certain designated public places is casual. And no one who doesn't like the idea of it is forced to see it. The children are educated with the right information with regards to the entire concept of this issue. The legal age is 12 anyways in our Empire

P.h. Elijah Marciano
Commisioner ERA
20-12-2003, 21:20
The question is, why would someone want to do it in public ?

Voyeurism is no longer a pychiatric sexual misconduct in the Empire of Nebula God, a group of voyeurist wrote to our senate sometime ago plus the careful studies and analysis, thus made us produce a bill that shall allow public exhibition of affection. Sex is so over-rated.
The Voyeurist group are private people too. Them like the "normal people" needs to be better understood.



P.h. Balam Menandres
Center for Enriched Studies
Human Behaviour Dept.
21-12-2003, 00:45
Why do politicians always meddle in our sex life? I don't intrude when they're in the bedroom!
Youngtung
21-12-2003, 03:09
The Empire is fine with public showings of sexuality, however, we do have rules to the certain types of sex that are possible. We also do not allow gay/lesbian couples to show their sexuality in public. The Empire belives that marriage and couples should only be between a man and woman, gay/lesbian marriages and sex are completely outlawed in this Empire.
21-12-2003, 04:02
I have to question the relevancy of this topic.
21-12-2003, 04:14
Would you allow sexual intercourse in public in your country?

No way, people would stop and look, and then nothing would ever get done. Then the economy would collapse and stuff. :P
21-12-2003, 05:21
no and that's that

:evil: Reges :twisted: Thantos :evil:
Leader of the National Gaurd

Prmission by:
:twisted: Tyrannus :evil: Thantos :twisted:
Dictator of Thunderstrike
" :twisted: Sexual intercourse is for marrid coupples or else you get :evil: killed :evil: by the :twisted: Gullitin :twisted: , sure thats old but it works :twisted: "
25-12-2003, 00:31
I have to question the relevancy of this topic.

Sex is a common human instinct... the raw animal instinct we all have. Which is like drugs, a common root of so many problems because it is still treated as a taboo, like it doesn't exist. The thing is it does, even trolls have sex.

Sex plays an important role in the people of a developing nation's lives, yet at any rate it last for not really longer than 30 minutes at most.


If it's beyond our total control. Why not legalize it? Live and let live.

The funny thing is after we had the legalization of this bill, the rate of voyeurism hasn't increased at all.

Art.690 Line 1. Public exhibition of affection is legal, as long as it's not promoting violence and done in a responsible manner in Public Places1 ( malls, city halls, streets, public transport, and the likes): that may include the following [edited for legal purposes]
Line 2. Public exhibition of affection is legal, as long as it's not promoting violence and done in a responsible more comfortable manner in Designated Areas where the signs "C.A." are displayed. A minimal fee* is required to enter the designated locations.

*May change without prior notice


P.H. Aviator di Marco
Adept II
Citizens Act Against Sexual Taboos
25-12-2003, 00:41
The Nintendo Emerates say yes, we do have public surveillance cameras; might as well put them to good use and make some money on the world wide web :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: !


Evidence you've never had any kind of sexual relations:

1. "The Nintendo Emerates"
2. Recording people having sex to show it on the internet
3. Do I need another one?
25-12-2003, 04:45
Ziliarn allows intercourse (or 'intercoruse') in public, just not near major roads. Ever since the Great Pileup Of '02 was caused when the drivers couldn't help but watch.
Zachnia
25-12-2003, 05:15
Sex doesn't have to be a disgusting thing. If you grow up with sex happening around you, then it isn't disgusting, so after a few generations, you can have the freedom, without the idea of disgust.
12-02-2004, 01:56
Theres no reason why a nation couldn't thrive with massive orgies going on daily right out in public. The biggest threat would be diseases. but who cares about those, everyones having sex.

I know I wouldn't mind walking down the street and seeing lots of people screwing. hell if I had the time I might jump in there, so long as I was the caboose. :P

choochooo
Frisbeeteria
12-02-2004, 02:01
Frisbeeteria
12-02-2004, 02:02
choochooo
I just want to know how you managed to do gravedigging on this scale when everyone else was so server-lagged they couldn't even post?
Hazanian CP
12-02-2004, 02:49
The People's Republic of the Hazanain Communist Party's official stance on this subject: we allow this freedom to anyone over the age of 12 (our legal age for all things), as long as it is done in our special parks with the entrance fee paid. We will sell recordings to participants at extremely high prices, much like amusement park rides sell photos. Also, we will show the best of these on a government-run pay-per-view channel. (OOC: no i'm not some stupid 12 yr old, i just believe people are mature enough then)

The backwards, broken away part of our country says this:
The Confederate States of Hazania not only allows this, but all people are required to engage in public sexual activity every day. If this is not done, they will be sold as sex slaves. Children from the age of 5, when they are taken to secure government education camps, are required to take sexual intercourse as a class at least one semester per year. Nudity is also required in this country. Thanks to Hazanian CP for representing us. (OOC: The NS server is too slow to log out and log in as another country)
12-02-2004, 02:57
Its hard to have sex and there not be anything obscene about it.
absolutely agree with you! :)
12-02-2004, 02:59
The Great Theocracy of Why I Love Napalm says no.

Public sex is discouraged in our country, because we still believe sexual intercourse to be a form of physical love, unlike many other nations. There are monasteries and temples, even the temple of the home, in which this physical love can be manifested. It also might leave nasty stains on the pavement/grass.

So anyway... NO.
Frisbeeteria
12-02-2004, 03:01
Folks, this was resurrected from nearly two months ago. There's no proposal on the stage, and no reason to keep this topic alive in the UN forum. If you want to talk about sex, there are doubtless several choices in the General forum. Why not try them instead?

Please, just let this one drift back into the land of forgotten silliness.
The Global Market
12-02-2004, 03:03
Of course not! The majority of my nation is conservative and would NEVER stand for such unmoral acts to be done in public! :shock:

The majority does not have the right to legislate for dissenting individuals what to do with their bodies.

Public space is for everyone, not the majority.
Tactical Grace
12-02-2004, 05:16
Doobion, please do not bump such old topics, particularly ones relating to long-resolved UN business.

Tactical Grace
Forum Moderator