ImperlisticPrussia
21-11-2003, 20:48
FAO UN Delegates and Foreign Sectaries
Sir
Thank you for this assignment. Firstly allow the Government of the Holy Empire, and its associated East African Colonies ImperlisticPrussia to announce that it is not, nor does it wish to be in the UN. Therefore this can only be advise to other delegates which the in the aid of defeating this unjust bill.
I shall go through the points in turn expressing my grave doubts over the ideology and content, practicality and use of the proposed scheme.
1. This is unreasonable on several counts.
a) It will be the case that there will be more unions which will make “ending disputes” much harder as whatever method is used will have to be employed more than once. Diplomacy will be more difficult and there is not necessarily going to be a broad consensus between all factions of the union.
B) Recognition ought to be withheld from groups in which the union is no more than a front for Leftist Militancy which surely has far to many negative consequences to consider.
C) This proposal gives no direction on how long a union has to be in operation before it can strike or begin a number of other unionist activities.
2. This too is entirely unacceptable because:
a) It will allow give terrorists the green light to operate in these countries, and therefore lessen national security.
b) This invitation to engage in strike action will damage the economy of every nation and will SEVERLY DAMAGE the economy of fledging states who need a strong economy so that they can fund “Modest, defence orientated Populace and Material Security Schemes”
c) 60 Days is utterly unreasonable as it represents around ¼ of actual working days, therefore on average ¼ of GDP
3. No- the same problems RE Terrorism and loss of GDP
4 This proposed autonomy is unwise.
a) Government “advise” is necessary. Many organisations would from the beginning be fundamentally at odds with how organisations of the nature operate. Government help is therefore entirely warranted in this issue
b) Especially in “organisation” what is the proposed regulation and monitoring, so that a 1915-17 “Red Guards” situation does not occur ie increased militancy at the cost of money, material and human life
c) As in every election sometimes the uneducated need as gentle nudge in the correct direction. For example can no one think of a a certain character who may have begin life in, to make something up entirely, a German Workers Party- would it not have been better for a little nudging at this point.
5. The term “anti union action” could be used to defeat legitimate Government business re its defence policy. Furthermore this broad scheme could be used to hide terror behind and links to the radical left.
6. As all citizens in all countries we, the Government of the Holy Empire of ImperlisticPrussia expect al citizens to obey the laws of the land* entirely.
7. Since the resolution should not get passed this point is altogether irrelevant.
Kaiser Matt the Ace CiC Army Navy Airforce, Special Forces, Chief Diplomat, Policy Specilist. VC For defeating communisim armed only with a buket of sand
* Obviously, there should be some evidence of a flexable policy in this respsct
Sir
Thank you for this assignment. Firstly allow the Government of the Holy Empire, and its associated East African Colonies ImperlisticPrussia to announce that it is not, nor does it wish to be in the UN. Therefore this can only be advise to other delegates which the in the aid of defeating this unjust bill.
I shall go through the points in turn expressing my grave doubts over the ideology and content, practicality and use of the proposed scheme.
1. This is unreasonable on several counts.
a) It will be the case that there will be more unions which will make “ending disputes” much harder as whatever method is used will have to be employed more than once. Diplomacy will be more difficult and there is not necessarily going to be a broad consensus between all factions of the union.
B) Recognition ought to be withheld from groups in which the union is no more than a front for Leftist Militancy which surely has far to many negative consequences to consider.
C) This proposal gives no direction on how long a union has to be in operation before it can strike or begin a number of other unionist activities.
2. This too is entirely unacceptable because:
a) It will allow give terrorists the green light to operate in these countries, and therefore lessen national security.
b) This invitation to engage in strike action will damage the economy of every nation and will SEVERLY DAMAGE the economy of fledging states who need a strong economy so that they can fund “Modest, defence orientated Populace and Material Security Schemes”
c) 60 Days is utterly unreasonable as it represents around ¼ of actual working days, therefore on average ¼ of GDP
3. No- the same problems RE Terrorism and loss of GDP
4 This proposed autonomy is unwise.
a) Government “advise” is necessary. Many organisations would from the beginning be fundamentally at odds with how organisations of the nature operate. Government help is therefore entirely warranted in this issue
b) Especially in “organisation” what is the proposed regulation and monitoring, so that a 1915-17 “Red Guards” situation does not occur ie increased militancy at the cost of money, material and human life
c) As in every election sometimes the uneducated need as gentle nudge in the correct direction. For example can no one think of a a certain character who may have begin life in, to make something up entirely, a German Workers Party- would it not have been better for a little nudging at this point.
5. The term “anti union action” could be used to defeat legitimate Government business re its defence policy. Furthermore this broad scheme could be used to hide terror behind and links to the radical left.
6. As all citizens in all countries we, the Government of the Holy Empire of ImperlisticPrussia expect al citizens to obey the laws of the land* entirely.
7. Since the resolution should not get passed this point is altogether irrelevant.
Kaiser Matt the Ace CiC Army Navy Airforce, Special Forces, Chief Diplomat, Policy Specilist. VC For defeating communisim armed only with a buket of sand
* Obviously, there should be some evidence of a flexable policy in this respsct