11-11-2003, 08:43
So the UN again stands to make itself a laughingstock by pushing for a radical motion that, if taken at it's word, condemns all of us who are unable to sustain our existence through photosynthesis to starvation.
I quote - "We propose that all nations under the UN charter respect the very essence of life and vow to preserve and protect it, in all its many forms whether human, or otherwise."
This means, killing and eating that potato would violate the letter of this resolution.
Now, I don't know about you, but when I eat a brace of conies, 'taters are absolutely mandatory.
Doesn't anyone read these proposals before endorsing them?
I quote - "We propose that all nations under the UN charter respect the very essence of life and vow to preserve and protect it, in all its many forms whether human, or otherwise."
This means, killing and eating that potato would violate the letter of this resolution.
Now, I don't know about you, but when I eat a brace of conies, 'taters are absolutely mandatory.
Doesn't anyone read these proposals before endorsing them?