NationStates Jolt Archive

You can set all the resolutions you want in the U.N. I am no longer a memeber and here is what I intend to do.

I intend to employ small children of any age in dirty little sweat shops. I will strive to be the country that manufactures the most toxic of all toxic waste. We will assure this through frequent testing on animals. (only the cute ones)

We will then form the worlds first Anti-Environmentalist Movement, from which we will send forth suicide toxic avengers to poison the lands of all you power-mongering infidels.

Of course everyone will then have to feel sorry for my country because we must just be misunderstood. After all just like the palastinian bombers, it is our only way of fighting against being dominated by a U.N. that cares nothing for my people or their freedoms.

You liberals make me sick....the difference between a liberal and a conservative is the ability to separate logic from emotion.

Hey theres and Idea, My nation is creating a law that NO LIBERALS are allowed to swim in any water supply which directly or indirectly flows into international waters. The reason for this new law is that in my country, Liberals are considered Toxic Waste. They are Toxic to your brain and a Waste of space. The penalty for this new law will be worse than capital punishment to you liberals, you will be subject to 24 hours a day of Rush Limbaugh for the rest of your life or until you have been converted.

The Griffindon Republican Congress rises and applaudes the Pangaean Planet.
Supreme Chancellor Griffin extends his hand and an offer of Allegience.
Please enjoy our gift of the finest meats and cheeses in all the land. We hope that you will seriously consider becoming allies.

Lord Evif notes that with a little call to the President he could easily wipe both of these puny nations from the face of the earth, if it weren't for Raysian support of Griffindon. He announces:

Goobergunchia is placing an embargo on Pangean goods and will extend refugee status to residents of those nations.

The Dictatorship of Griffindon places an official stance of Aggressive Disinclination towards Goobergunchia.
Supreme Chancellor Griffin proposes they watch their step.

The Dictatorship of Griffindon places an official stance of Aggressive Disinclination towards Goobergunchia.
Supreme Chancellor Griffin proposes they watch their step.

You do realize that if you didn't have allies I could nuke you into oblivion in about a minute, do you?

You've only got a 9 million population...your army is at most around 750 thousand. (Thanks Tisonica!)

Just keep this in mind.

This has been an OOC post.

OOC: Goob, I think you mean 750 thousand.

IC:

-Offical press statement from the president of Tisonica-

BAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA!!! You n00b!

You will recend the statement you just made The Pangaean Planet. If you do not I will be forced to take action, and when I do, I will not stop until your "leader" is dragged through the street while tomatos are thrown at him.

OOC: And learn which forum is which, this would be in international incidents, the UN forum is for debating proposals.

OOC: This is a UN debate. If it escalates to a war, which I doubt it will, THEN it would belong in INI.
IC: The Dictatorship of Griffindon does have allies, but even if they did not it would not matter. Just because we are small does not mean we will back down on our stances. We refused to change our beliefs based on what countries are able to bully others. If we die fighting for our cause then it is worth it.
We are not declaring war upon you. We are mearly warning you to watch your step.

The United Nations
A forum for UN members to debate proposals and resolutions.

International Incidents
Declarations of war, international trade, diplomatic crises, and more. [Posts must be in-character; role-playing etiquette is enforced.]

It is an international incident, and does not belong in this forum.

IC: The Dictatorship of Griffindon does have allies, but even if they did not it would not matter. Just because we are small does not mean we will back down on our stances. We refused to change our beliefs based on what countries are able to bully others. If we die fighting for our cause then it is worth it.
We are not declaring war upon you. We are mearly warning you to watch your step.

I do not heed your pathetic warning, if this were only your personal views we would be gracious enough to let it slide, but we do not tolerate devastating invringements on the rights of the people like this and we do not tolerate reckless disregard for the environment.

You will back down if I decide it is neccesary that you do so, whether I force you to do so or you do so of your own free will is yet to be seen.

From: The Incorporated States of Mushroomius
To: The Pangaean Planet

As founder of the Coalition of Universal Rights, I cannot help but be drawn towards this issue. Perhaps we can diplomatically solve this dilemma, as you may be compelled to realize that your people may put up with this treatment for only so long.

Your edicts violate the very fabric of the Coalition, and we would be happy to assist you in finding a more hospitable method of governing your citizens.

You may also be compelled to accept my offer due to the fact that your threat also gives numerous nations reason to go to war with you, and that our Coalition may militarily enforce human rights.

Here here. I agree with this topic whole heartedly. But I must remind you Liberals cant help it they are either very sick or insane. Dont blame them blame thier parents. They do after all......

* Note to self : allocate more money to our scientists researching nature-friendly nukes ... They may be of use soon *

We have not declared war on anyone, nor do we intend to. However, we would suggest that those that are planning on nuking us or our allies watch their step. Just because we refuse to bow to a liberal doctrine is not justification for violent actions.

You liberals make me sick....the difference between a liberal and a conservative is the ability to separate logic from emotion.

Of course, you're a paragon of logic and rationality, aren't you???

We have not declared war on anyone, nor do we intend to. However, we would suggest that those that are planning on nuking us or our allies watch their step. Just because we refuse to bow to a liberal doctrine is not justification for violent actions.

No, but your extreme civil rights infringments are. So back down or I be forced to back yourself down for you.

We have not declared war on anyone, nor do we intend to. However, we would suggest that those that are planning on nuking us or our allies watch their step. Just because we refuse to bow to a liberal doctrine is not justification for violent actions.

No, but your extreme civil rights infringments are. So back down or I be forced to back yourself down for you.

The President has informed me that Goobergunchia will aid Tisonica in actions taken with respect to Griffindon.

Lord Evif, Goobergunchian UN Ambassador
DU Regional Delegate

We have not declared war on anyone, nor do we intend to. However, we would suggest that those that are planning on nuking us or our allies watch their step. Just because we refuse to bow to a liberal doctrine is not justification for violent actions.

No, but your extreme civil rights infringments are. So back down or I be forced to back yourself down for you.

The President has informed me that Goobergunchia will aid Tisonica in actions taken with respect to Griffindon.

Lord Evif, Goobergunchian UN Ambassador
DU Regional Delegate

Really? You always seem to take the less extreme road, well I am certainly suprised. Any aid will be appreciated.

OOC: I guess I'm going to have to make my president have more of an attitude.

You think liberals have a problem separating emotion from logic...your entire statement was based mainly on your HATE of the liberals...Hate is an emotion. I'll just leave it at that and let you think about it on your own. Next time watch what you write, because you're making a fool of yourself.

.
The difference between a liberal and a conservative is the ability to separate logic from emotion.


Exactly. We "liberals" use reason while you rant.

You think liberals have a problem separating emotion from logic...your entire statement was based mainly on your HATE of the liberals...Hate is an emotion. I'll just leave it at that and let you think about it on your own. Next time watch what you write, because you're making a fool of yourself.

Good on ya!

We have not declared war on anyone, nor do we intend to. However, we would suggest that those that are planning on nuking us or our allies watch their step. Just because we refuse to bow to a liberal doctrine is not justification for violent actions.

No, but your extreme civil rights infringments are. So back down or I be forced to back yourself down for you.

And what are these infringements on civil rights?

We have not declared war on anyone, nor do we intend to. However, we would suggest that those that are planning on nuking us or our allies watch their step. Just because we refuse to bow to a liberal doctrine is not justification for violent actions.

No, but your extreme civil rights infringments are. So back down or I be forced to back yourself down for you.

And what are these infringements on civil rights?

The same ones mentioned in the first post of this thread.

.
The difference between a liberal and a conservative is the ability to separate logic from emotion.


Exactly. We "liberals" use reason while you rant.

Point of order, there are just as many liberals who rant as conservatives. And there are just as many liberals who argue rationally as conservatives.

Griffindon will not be partaking in the same practices, we merely support them. We also feel that they were merely making a point and do not take them seriously.

the Allied states of Armandal have reviewed this issue and we DID vote 7000-0 agianst it in our houses, agianst the latest UN proposal... but there is no need to go to war...the question's arise....

1) now the law is passed what does this mean to the world nations

2) do non industrial countries have to pay taxes towards the UN to help remove waste that we dont produce?.....

3) has the latest resolution split many nations from the world house of delegates?


We hope not but stand by what we voted. We were against this proposal and understand that these issues now need to be dealt with...

"The Governing Houses of Armandal"

We have not declared war on anyone, nor do we intend to. However, we would suggest that those that are planning on nuking us or our allies watch their step. Just because we refuse to bow to a liberal doctrine is not justification for violent actions.

No, but your extreme civil rights infringments are. So back down or I be forced to back yourself down for you.

And what are these infringements on civil rights?

I intend to employ small children of any age in dirty little sweat shops...we will send forth suicide toxic avengers to poison the lands of all you power-mongering infidels
How's that, for starters?

Sincerely,
Miranda Googleplex
United Nations Ambassador
Community of Gurthark
---
Gurthark is a member of the Coalition of Universal Rights

Griffindon will not be partaking in the same practices, we merely support them. We also feel that they were merely making a point and do not take them seriously.

We have not declared war on anyone, nor do we intend to. However, we would suggest that those that are planning on nuking us or our allies watch their step. Just because we refuse to bow to a liberal doctrine is not justification for violent actions.

Then you will do what I've been asking you to do this whole time, recend the part of the statement made in bold.

Not unlike what hasnt been done in the past (*cough*bush*cough*), the small Republic of Empresas will morally defend which-so-ever side in this matter, as long as that side sends over some investment funds into the Republic

Signed
Emperesas Respresentative to the UN

Lord Evif notes that with a little call to the President he could easily wipe both of these puny nations from the face of the earth, if it weren't for Raysian support of Griffindon. He announces:

Goobergunchia is placing an embargo on Pangean goods and will extend refugee status to residents of those nations.
The United Socialist States of Qaaolchoura backs the Liberal Unitary Republic of Goobergunchia in this.

OOC: Could the two of us together crush these two and Rayesia?

Edit:ed because the "o" is right next to the "i" on the keyboard.

Lord Evif notes that with a little call to the President he could easily wipe both of these puny nations from the face of the earth, if it weren't for Raysian support of Griffindon. He announces:

Goobergunchia is placing an embargo on Pangean goods and will extend refugee status to residents of those nations.
The Unoted Socialist States of Qaaolchoura backs the Liberal Unitary Republic of Goobergunchia in this.

OOC: Could the two of us together crush these two and Rayesia?

Grrrr... why do you people always ignore me???

*mutters* why do I care what a country whos name even has bad grammar in it thinks?

Grrrr... why do you people always ignore me???

*mutters* why do I care what a country whos name even has bad grammar in it thinks?
I thought that you were just giving supplies. :?

Think Qatar, Samarqand, Qandahar.

*fumes* why do people always think that my name needs a "u" after the "Q"?

Grrrr... why do you people always ignore me???

*mutters* why do I care what a country whos name even has bad grammar in it thinks?
I thought that you were just giving supplies. :?

BAAHAHAHAHA!!! Did you not see what I posted? I was the one being very insane and warmonger-ish.

Think Qatar, Samarqand, Qandahar.

*fumes* why do people always think that my name needs a "u" after the "Q"?

Because they speak english.

OOC: So two April Nation Alone couldcertainly win, as I know that Rayesia Is a July Nation Like myself, and my aid, although negligible, would make victory quicker. Shall we? :twisted:

modalert :arrow: International Incidents

OOC: So two April Nation Alone couldcertainly win, as I know that Rayesia Is a July Nation Like myself, and my aid, although negligible, would make victory quicker. Shall we? :twisted:

modalert :arrow: International Incidents

I have no idea who Rayesia is, I'll probably support you anyways, but why exactly are you invading?

Also, I can't seem to find any posts by Rayesia.

OOC: So two April Nation Alone couldcertainly win, as I know that Rayesia Is a July Nation Like myself, and my aid, although negligible, would make victory quicker. Shall we? :twisted:

modalert :arrow: International Incidents

I have no idea who Rayesia is, I'll probably support you anyways, but why exactly are you invading?

Also, I can't seem to find any posts by Rayesia.Rayesia is a July nation with a high post count run by a mormon, but beyond that I know nothing, except that Goobergunchia claims that he is protecting these two little bug-like(size wise) nations, which is good enough for me. :twisted:

OOC: So two April Nation Alone couldcertainly win, as I know that Rayesia Is a July Nation Like myself, and my aid, although negligible, would make victory quicker. Shall we? :twisted:

modalert :arrow: International Incidents

I have no idea who Rayesia is, I'll probably support you anyways, but why exactly are you invading?

Also, I can't seem to find any posts by Rayesia.Rayesia is a July nation with a high post count run by a mormon, but beyond that I know nothing, except that Goobergunchia claims that he is protecting these two little bug-like(size wise) nations, which is good enough for me. :twisted:

Ohhh, I'm quite aware of him. You mean Raysia, well, I would have no problem creaming him. But I really doubt he is protecting these nations, if so, it's probably an alliance thing, I don't see him going through with it though.

Edit: Found out what Goob is talking about. "Raysian support for Griffindon" (http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1980096&highlight=#1980096) I have no doubt that if it came to war Raysia would back down.

Of course, I could take on all three of them myself, at worst suffering a minor defoeat, but three of us could eliminate them, and even I, the smallest of the three of us could turn Pangea and Gryphon into smoking craters. :twisted:

Of course, I could take on all three of them myself, at worst suffering a minor defoeat, but three of us could eliminate them, and even I, the smallest of the three of us could turn Pangea and Gryphon into smoking craters. :twisted:

You underestimate the godmoding power of a cazed n00b who is going to lose either way.

Griffindon will not be partaking in the same practices, we merely support them. We also feel that they were merely making a point and do not take them seriously.

We have not declared war on anyone, nor do we intend to. However, we would suggest that those that are planning on nuking us or our allies watch their step. Just because we refuse to bow to a liberal doctrine is not justification for violent actions.

Then you will do what I've been asking you to do this whole time, recend the part of the statement made in bold.
Why should we rescend this statement? This is merely threatening any country that would threaten us. If we are not agressed, we will not agress. We are not declaring any form of violence towards these nations, unless they declare violence towards us. Are we supposed to merely bow down to the "might" of whatever country decides they would like to push us around?

The Federation of Glorious Humanity would like to congratulate the debaters on a most impressive display of peacock feathers. We would further wish to offer congratulations on creating a discussion so vastly entertaining that the transcript of it, when read to our Senate, caused virtually the entire body to fall out of their seats in convulsions of mirth.

It is our belief that The Pangaean Planet was merely intending to make a satirical point about the current status of most UN proposals, and the UN in general. We find ourselves in agreement with The Pangaean Planet's main point, which appears to us to be that the UN is assuming far too much control over the internal affairs of its member nations. The UN is a forum for all nations to meet together and come up with useful new ideas, NOT a world government. Individual nations are still sovereign, and their domestic affairs are their own problems so long as they do not interfere with or endanger another nation. Several recent proposals seem more determined to impose a specific code of conduct on all, instead of putting forward new ideas or plans for the future. We hope that this distressing trend is soon changed.

As for the talk of war, for the moment Glorious Humanity shall remain neutral, and continue to be entertained by this debate.

Alexander Johnson
UN Ambassador
Federation of Glorious Humanity

Of course, I could take on all three of them myself, at worst suffering a minor defoeat, but three of us could eliminate them, and even I, the smallest of the three of us could turn Pangea and Gryphon into smoking craters. :twisted:

Friends and Allies. Please - please - please don't leave me out. I'm not a liberal but I do believe in the democratic process which this nOObiE likes to ignore when it doesn't suit him. If this comes to push - Wolish is in.

Cheers,
W.

It is our belief that The Pangaean Planet was merely intending to make a satirical point about the current status of most UN proposals, and the UN in general. We find ourselves in agreement with The Pangaean Planet's main point, which appears to us to be that the UN is assuming far too much control over the internal affairs of its member nations. The UN is a forum for all nations to meet together and come up with useful new ideas, NOT a world government. Individual nations are still sovereign, and their domestic affairs are their own problems so long as they do not interfere with or endanger another nation. Several recent proposals seem more determined to impose a specific code of conduct on all, instead of putting forward new ideas or plans for the future. We hope that this distressing trend is soon changed.


Alexander Johnson
UN Ambassador
Federation of Glorious Humanity

Thank you for your excellent display of intelligence, Ambassador Johnson.

Griffindon will not be partaking in the same practices, we merely support them. We also feel that they were merely making a point and do not take them seriously.

We have not declared war on anyone, nor do we intend to. However, we would suggest that those that are planning on nuking us or our allies watch their step. Just because we refuse to bow to a liberal doctrine is not justification for violent actions.

Then you will do what I've been asking you to do this whole time, recend the part of the statement made in bold.
Why should we rescend this statement? This is merely threatening any country that would threaten us. If we are not agressed, we will not agress. We are not declaring any form of violence towards these nations, unless they declare violence towards us. Are we supposed to merely bow down to the "might" of whatever country decides they would like to push us around?

Yes, you are supposed to bow down. Espescially when you are the agressor, which you are in this case. Your ally (pangean) is commiting horrendus acts, and you threatened us not to take actions against him. Now apologise and recend the statement.

Griffindon will not be partaking in the same practices, we merely support them. We also feel that they were merely making a point and do not take them seriously.

We have not declared war on anyone, nor do we intend to. However, we would suggest that those that are planning on nuking us or our allies watch their step. Just because we refuse to bow to a liberal doctrine is not justification for violent actions.

Then you will do what I've been asking you to do this whole time, recend the part of the statement made in bold.
Why should we rescend this statement? This is merely threatening any country that would threaten us. If we are not agressed, we will not agress. We are not declaring any form of violence towards these nations, unless they declare violence towards us. Are we supposed to merely bow down to the "might" of whatever country decides they would like to push us around?

Yes, you are supposed to bow down. Espescially when you are the agressor, which you are in this case. Your ally (pangean) is commiting horrendus acts, and you threatened us not to take actions against him. Now apologise and recend the statement.

Maybe all nations that can't read sarcasm SHOULD be wiped out.
We are not the agressor, and we refuse to allow you to rule the world.

Maybe all nations that can't read sarcasm SHOULD be wiped out.
We are not the agressor, and we refuse to allow you to rule the world.

There is no sarcasm when it comes to RP, if you say you did something you did it. And you WILL back down, this is not a matter of ruling the world, this is a matter of not letting small n00b nations ruin the game for the rest of us.

First off, while Griffindon is a younger nation, I am not a "n00b."
Second it is you bullying by forcing other nations to comply to what you want them too.

First off, while Griffindon is a younger nation, I am not a "n00b."

A n00b is a person who has no idea what they are talking about, just like you, and you being young only adds to your n00bness.

Second it is you bullying by forcing other nations to comply to what you want them too.

And your point is?

First off, while Griffindon is a younger nation, I am not a "n00b."

A n00b is a person who has no idea what they are talking about, just like you, and you being young only adds to your n00bness.

Second it is you bullying by forcing other nations to comply to what you want them too.

And your point is?

I have been here since before there even WAS war.
So I think it's interresting that here you are parading a banner of "human rights" while also puting a gun to any country that doesn't make you happy.

Of course, I could take on all three of them myself, at worst suffering a minor defoeat, but three of us could eliminate them, and even I, the smallest of the three of us could turn Pangea and Gryphon into smoking craters. :twisted:

Friends and Allies. Please - please - please don't leave me out. I'm not a liberal but I do believe in the democratic process which this nOObiE likes to ignore when it doesn't suit him. If this comes to push - Wolish is in.

Cheers,
W.

We are honored to have Wolfish's support in this matter.

I have been here since before there even WAS war.
So I think it's interresting that here you are parading a banner of "human rights" while also puting a gun to any country that doesn't make you happy.

If so, you would know the answer to this question: Who was the slaver nation in the Slaver War?

lets settle this easily, alright? The Holy Empire of the Penguin Gods and The Kingdom of Excalvia AND the Rogue Nation of Silvinia, wish to become allies with Goobergunchia, and be help in any way we can

You can set all the resolutions you want in the U.N. I am no longer a memeber and here is what I intend to do.

I intend to employ small children of any age in dirty little sweat shops. I will strive to be the country that manufactures the most toxic of all toxic waste. We will assure this through frequent testing on animals. (only the cute ones)

We will then form the worlds first Anti-Environmentalist Movement, from which we will send forth suicide toxic avengers to poison the lands of all you power-mongering infidels.

Of course everyone will then have to feel sorry for my country because we must just be misunderstood. After all just like the palastinian bombers, it is our only way of fighting against being dominated by a U.N. that cares nothing for my people or their freedoms.

You liberals make me sick....the difference between a liberal and a conservative is the ability to separate logic from emotion.

Hey theres and Idea, My nation is creating a law that NO LIBERALS are allowed to swim in any water supply which directly or indirectly flows into international waters. The reason for this new law is that in my country, Liberals are considered Toxic Waste. They are Toxic to your brain and a Waste of space. The penalty for this new law will be worse than capital punishment to you liberals, you will be subject to 24 hours a day of Rush Limbaugh for the rest of your life or until you have been converted.
Let me guess. this is some sort of new concept to you :roll: i've had it in place for years. by the way, if you mess with me, you mess with my allies.

Of course, I could take on all three of them myself, at worst suffering a minor defoeat, but three of us could eliminate them, and even I, the smallest of the three of us could turn Pangea and Gryphon into smoking craters. :twisted:

Friends and Allies. Please - please - please don't leave me out. I'm not a liberal but I do believe in the democratic process which this nOObiE likes to ignore when it doesn't suit him. If this comes to push - Wolish is in.

Cheers,
W.

We are honored to have Wolfish's support in this matter.

I have been here since before there even WAS war.
So I think it's interresting that here you are parading a banner of "human rights" while also puting a gun to any country that doesn't make you happy.

If so, you would know the answer to this question: Who was the slaver nation in the Slaver War?
Actually, I wouldn't necessarily know that. I pay very little attention to these message boards, but I expect I would've picked it up if it was a big event. Unless it was during the summer. I was gone with minimal computer access during the summer, so my original country got shut down and I missed a good 4 months of this place.
My guess would be Akbar. Same country that started war of words with his assassination of protestors. There was no RPing back then.
Can you tell me about the country of Jaydania?

You can set all the resolutions you want in the U.N. I am no longer a memeber and here is what I intend to do.

I intend to employ small children of any age in dirty little sweat shops. I will strive to be the country that manufactures the most toxic of all toxic waste. We will assure this through frequent testing on animals. (only the cute ones)

We will then form the worlds first Anti-Environmentalist Movement, from which we will send forth suicide toxic avengers to poison the lands of all you power-mongering infidels.

Of course everyone will then have to feel sorry for my country because we must just be misunderstood. After all just like the palastinian bombers, it is our only way of fighting against being dominated by a U.N. that cares nothing for my people or their freedoms.

You liberals make me sick....the difference between a liberal and a conservative is the ability to separate logic from emotion.

Hey theres and Idea, My nation is creating a law that NO LIBERALS are allowed to swim in any water supply which directly or indirectly flows into international waters. The reason for this new law is that in my country, Liberals are considered Toxic Waste. They are Toxic to your brain and a Waste of space. The penalty for this new law will be worse than capital punishment to you liberals, you will be subject to 24 hours a day of Rush Limbaugh for the rest of your life or until you have been converted.
Let me guess. this is some sort of new concept to you :roll: i've had it in place for years. by the way, if you mess with me, you mess with my allies.

Lemme guess, the NCA. Bahahahahahaha! We formally spit on your puny allies. And let it be known that the adminstration of Tisonica believes that not only is the entire country of Arribastan, but also that Arribastan's minstry is obviously very weak and cowardly (and evidently not very intelligent) to make idle threats when he alone cannot manage to defend himself. If Arribastan had any real honor they would learn to fight on thier own.

OOC: If you are referring to only the statement that is in bold I don't personally plan on taking any action (just as long as you aren't dumping the toxic waste anywhere that would effect me) but if you follow all of the concepts mentioned in his post then, consequently, we most likely will do something, so please clarify what it is exactly you were implying in your post.

While Griffindon is not planning on agressing, we will support any conservative nations from this thread of discussion that are ATTACKED. If they launch the attack themselves, however, they are on their own as far as we're concerned.

UN Delegate Ulrich Nolte

While Griffindon is not planning on agressing, we will support any conservative nations from this thread of discussion that are ATTACKED. If they launch the attack themselves, however, they are on their own as far as we're concerned.

UN Delegate Ulrich Nolte

Exactly, you are saying you support Pangean, this will get you invaded. So either back down or face the consequences.

Quite a lovely country, aren't you, Tisonica. Parading human rights while imposing your will on other countries.
When did you appoint yourself boss of the world?

Of course, I could take on all three of them myself, at worst suffering a minor defoeat, but three of us could eliminate them, and even I, the smallest of the three of us could turn Pangea and Gryphon into smoking craters. :twisted:

Friends and Allies. Please - please - please don't leave me out. I'm not a liberal but I do believe in the democratic process which this nOObiE likes to ignore when it doesn't suit him. If this comes to push - Wolish is in.

Cheers,
W.
Why thank you Wolf, we'd be honored. :shock:

Of course with luck, Pangea and Gryphon should now see sense. :twisted:

Actually, I wouldn't necessarily know that. I pay very little attention to these message boards, but I expect I would've picked it up if it was a big event. Unless it was during the summer. I was gone with minimal computer access during the summer, so my original country got shut down and I missed a good 4 months of this place.
My guess would be Akbar. Same country that started war of words with his assassination of protestors. There was no RPing back then.
Can you tell me about the country of Jaydania?
Come on, we were not born yesterday. :roll:

Even I know who it was, and I was not around then. I just see references to the Amerigan Slaver Wars everwhere.

Ackbar!?!

Give me a break.

Jaydania?

Ain't heard of 'em.

You can set all the resolutions you want in the U.N. I am no longer a memeber...
:SNIP:

That's all we needed from you. Thank you for no longer taking up space, you troglodyte. And the same for your Oracle, Limbaugh, who instead of using natural substances from the earth as the original Oracle did, uses Oxycontin to issue his "beyond this world" musings.

What on earth does being born yesterday have to do with anything?
And what sense are we supposed to see? That a couple nations get together and decide they can enforce their will on other countries? We will not bow down to bullies, and rest assured, if you start unrightfully imposing your power upon other nations you won't last long.

I voted against the last 10 or so.

You're running for the Chair of the U.N. aren't you?

I'm a Democratic Socialist and voted agaisnt it because it mess with my country penal system & laws, altought we support clean waters. So stop dishing all the left, it's not our fault that the US political parties are retarded.

Anyway, we will leave the UN too if further resolutions attacking member countries national soverignity are passed. We still can't believe that this one passed.

The idea was clearly communitarian, not conservative. But anyways, it definately is not within the scope of the UN to force nations to clean up their acts.

The idea was clearly communitarian, not conservative. But anyways, it definately is not within the scope of the UN to force nations to clean up their acts.
Erm, actually, it is. You forfeit your national sovereignty upon joining the UN.