NEW UN PROPOSAL! IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!
To my fellow UN members and neighbours,
I have submitted a new proposal to the UN.
Please carefully review it and vote FOR it!
The Rogue Nation of Assassin Domination
Is it just me, or is that a broken link? :?
Yeah it is a broken link.
Here's the correct link:
You've got to be kidding me. I can't believe that any nation could put forward such an irresponsible proposal. That it has the little support it does is not surprising; that it actually received some support is sad.
First of all...have you seen the movie BOWLING FOR COLUMBINE? If not, then go watch it and you'll be opened up to just a tiny bit of secrets that the so called great democratic US governement is hiding from everyone.
Secondly, think about WHY the US declared war on Iraq, a country which the US government sent millions of dollars and weapons "in aid" in the 1990s. FYI, the US also gave the Osama Bin Laden and his Taliban clan millions of dollars "in aid" as well. Bush and his minions aren't attacking Iraq because they've got biological and chemical weapons...US couldn't care less if Iraq had nukes. The US is only worried about the damn OIL!
THINK ABOUT IT! Do you think the US is scared of nukes?!?! I bet they've got millions of them and they also know how to stop one way before it even gets close to any part of US.
So before you criticize my proposal or any proposal, think about what facts and proof you've got to prove your argument!
As long as Bush is president and the world regards the US as the almighty powerhouse country, then everyone loses.
You lose again.....nerd!
Riiiight...we'll see in a few years who "loses".
Judging by your lack of writing skills and knowledge, you don't give a damn about what happens in our world.
You're equivalent to a newborn baby oblivious of what's going on in the world today.
It's so fun watching you lose all the time.
Not as fun as tracking down your trailer trash ass and then...
Oh HI! You must be one of Assassination Domination's multi-countries. Nice to meet you.
so you're saying I can't refer my friends into this "game" and create our own region and all be in it?
wouldn't you rather be in a region with all your friends instead of stranded alone with strangers...
Michael Moore: 0
I was only specifically referring to the part where the US gave millions of dollars to Iraq and Afghanistan "in aid". This is relevant to the current war in Iraq and to Bush's actions.
Nowhere in that piece of writing that you referred us to does it say anything about the "aid" that the US gave to Iraq.
And even if it's true that the US and the UN gave Afghanistan the money to "relieve famine", are we 100% sure that ALL the money went towards those causes? Seriously people...don't be so gullible and believe everything the media and the government tell you.
Think about this: Have you ever been lied to by a family member or a close friend or your gf/bf/wife/husband? If those people close to you can deceive you, do you really think the government/police/secret agencies/etc won't?
Wouldn't such an action as this proposal describes make the Envoy from Assassin Domination and those who support such a suggestion to be just as wrong, or even more so, than what they beleive President Bush to be?
As the old saying goes, "Two lefts don't make a right".
Maybe you need to get your information straight before you start using hear-say to push your point. Your entire arguement against Bush has been in-validated by the mere fact that your sources are untrustworthy.
You claim that Bush and the U.S. Government are at fault for where the world is now, and are only interested in Iraq's oil. You seem to forget the U.N. resolution concerning the disarmament of Iraq and Saddam's blatant refusal to comply for 10-11 years now. Where is the U.N. backbone? If one nation should not be forced to comply with U.N. resolutions, then why should any? This is, if you recall, the major reason the pre-cursor to the U.N., the League of Nations, failed. No one respected the power thereof.
As for funding terrorist activities, you imply that the U.S. Government did so intentionally, and yet have no proof of such. Merely the possibility (aye, and perhaps likelihood - but no direct proof) that the funding provided by the U.S. Government was directed primarily at terrorist organizations. Are you so naive to think that any terrorist organization would shoot itself in the foot by biting the hand that feeds it?
WOW I guess I picked a good time to join this lol :wink:
There is no one nation or individual to hold responsible for the state of the world as it is today.
However, terrorist organizations can and have shot themselves in the foot, many times; the United States is renowned for offering aid to dissident groups in order to aim them at other dissident groups, or at a given political regime - it's the old 'enemy of my enemy' trick.
Whether you're looking at Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Angola, or various South American and Central American countries, it really doesn't matter; it -is- a fairly well documented fact, and not even necessarily something to view as an insult; when it works, it's great for the CIA's purposes (or whichever branch of the US is the one putting it into motion).
The problem is that the enemy of your enemy isn't necessarily going to stay YOUR friend, and even if he gets into power over said enemy - that doesn't mean he'll continue to be grateful for your help if you ask for too much. And 'too much' is a very flexible concept.
I strongly recommend reading your news from a wide variety of sources, and likewise, your history; any one country's information is bound to be biased, or leave items out. That is the nature of the beast.
How could anyone come up with such a dumb thing? Why do you think George Bush should be executed anyway?! Do you live in the USA?
I bet he gets all of his information from CNN...
Do you think it's even remotely possible that the President has access to intelligence data that CNN doesn't? Just because it wasn't on Headline News doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
President Bush and Powell didn't show all of their cards concerning Iraq. Why could that be? Because the information was classified? No. In fact, information in and of itself really isn't all that classified -- it's the source or the means with which we've gathered intel that's classified. So by withholding some pieces of information, they protected the source/sources of intelligence that was providing very valuable data.
Did we prove our case to the UN? Absolutely, without a shadow of a doubt. But those who don't WANT to believe simply won't, no matter what information you give to them.
---Post deleted by NationStates Moderators---
Wow! THIS THREAD IS BUMPALICIOUS! WILL YOU EVER IP BAN ME YOU BUNCH OF INFIDEL WHITEASSES? 8)
Not to mention he had his 8 last nations deleted :roll:
Damn...I didnt get to read the proposal and make fun of it.
wanders back to the beach to watch black asps mate in the wilds
Sounds like it was about... executing Bush??
MODALERT gravedigging, and please lock this one up