Romaniaa IV
04-02-2006, 21:58
Greetings fellow members of the United Nations,
I have a suggestion about the way repealing resolutions works (maybe it could be implemented in NS2 if my idea is changing the game too much - if you find it a good idea).
The basic idea is this:
Repealing a resolution has some unexpected effects for the nations that are born between the voting of the original resolution and the repeal.
Let's say this happends, in this order:
1)Nation A is founded (and joins the UN)
2)Resolution R is voted
3)Nation B is founded (and joins the UN)
4)R is repealed
For the nation A it's as the resolution has never existed. (Let's say A had 100p of something... the resolution added 10p -> A has 110p; then the repeal came and made A have 100p once again).
But B will be affected: (if he had 100p he ends up with 90p).
This p's (eg 100p, 90p) are just a way to evaluate the nation state.
Some solutions:
1)When you join the UN you will be affected by all the resolutions that are actual, and when you quit UN you are effected in the opposite direction by all the resolutions that are actual. The repeal system with this solution would stay as it is.
or
2)A Repeal affect only the UN nations that were in the UN when the resolution that is being repealed was voted.
The motivation for this post was that I've seen that the last two repeals have affected my Civil rights and my Political rights, but I was never affected positively by the resolutions that have been repealed.
Please post your view on this (if you think that the system needs some changes you can say what solution you would support).
If we find a mechanism that the majority likes and that is a little different then the current one but it can't be implemented in NS we could propose it for NS2 (I am sure that there will be resolutions in there too).
happy readings,
Romaniaa IV
I have a suggestion about the way repealing resolutions works (maybe it could be implemented in NS2 if my idea is changing the game too much - if you find it a good idea).
The basic idea is this:
Repealing a resolution has some unexpected effects for the nations that are born between the voting of the original resolution and the repeal.
Let's say this happends, in this order:
1)Nation A is founded (and joins the UN)
2)Resolution R is voted
3)Nation B is founded (and joins the UN)
4)R is repealed
For the nation A it's as the resolution has never existed. (Let's say A had 100p of something... the resolution added 10p -> A has 110p; then the repeal came and made A have 100p once again).
But B will be affected: (if he had 100p he ends up with 90p).
This p's (eg 100p, 90p) are just a way to evaluate the nation state.
Some solutions:
1)When you join the UN you will be affected by all the resolutions that are actual, and when you quit UN you are effected in the opposite direction by all the resolutions that are actual. The repeal system with this solution would stay as it is.
or
2)A Repeal affect only the UN nations that were in the UN when the resolution that is being repealed was voted.
The motivation for this post was that I've seen that the last two repeals have affected my Civil rights and my Political rights, but I was never affected positively by the resolutions that have been repealed.
Please post your view on this (if you think that the system needs some changes you can say what solution you would support).
If we find a mechanism that the majority likes and that is a little different then the current one but it can't be implemented in NS we could propose it for NS2 (I am sure that there will be resolutions in there too).
happy readings,
Romaniaa IV