Boraas
09-10-2004, 12:14
hi.
I have 2 nations. the first one (#1), I run by my rules, in the second one (#2), I answer the issues how I think people from around here (IRL) would have answered.
the obvious difference is that #2 has the title "World Benchmark" when it comes to political freedoms, instead of "Outlawed". :)
what's bugging me, are these variances:
#1: brink of extinction, "hard-working, cynical population" and the private sector is lead by the Pizza Delivery industry and Soda Sales.
#2: frolics freely, "compassionate, intelligent population" and the private sector is lead by Automobile Manufacturing industry and IT.
I agree that in #1 "hard-working, cynical population" is correct, but how come nation #2 has a "compassionate, intelligent population"? I haven't answered any issues yet, that would determine such a thing.
also, the forest issues were in those states from the beginning. is that randomly decided, or are a nations forests lush just because of the democracy? sounds strange..
why are the private sectors so different in the 2 nations? one could almost think that where the political freedoms are high, people are automatically smarter than other, which leads to this gap.. or is this randomly selected too?
yes, I have answered quite a few issues in both nations, but none of them had anything to do with these "problems". I'd really like to know more.
thanks in advance.
/Boraas
I have 2 nations. the first one (#1), I run by my rules, in the second one (#2), I answer the issues how I think people from around here (IRL) would have answered.
the obvious difference is that #2 has the title "World Benchmark" when it comes to political freedoms, instead of "Outlawed". :)
what's bugging me, are these variances:
#1: brink of extinction, "hard-working, cynical population" and the private sector is lead by the Pizza Delivery industry and Soda Sales.
#2: frolics freely, "compassionate, intelligent population" and the private sector is lead by Automobile Manufacturing industry and IT.
I agree that in #1 "hard-working, cynical population" is correct, but how come nation #2 has a "compassionate, intelligent population"? I haven't answered any issues yet, that would determine such a thing.
also, the forest issues were in those states from the beginning. is that randomly decided, or are a nations forests lush just because of the democracy? sounds strange..
why are the private sectors so different in the 2 nations? one could almost think that where the political freedoms are high, people are automatically smarter than other, which leads to this gap.. or is this randomly selected too?
yes, I have answered quite a few issues in both nations, but none of them had anything to do with these "problems". I'd really like to know more.
thanks in advance.
/Boraas