The Resurgent Dream
12-04-2007, 23:31
The Ochiang Government swiftly got to work on its program of amending the constitution. Of course, the Government could not simply pass amendments at will. At best, it could propose an amendment to the Congress which, if it approved, could then propose it to the people. Under the current system, any proposed amendment would need to be approved by a majority in every single Member. Mr. Ochiang, of course, was aware than essentially none of his proposed reforms enjoyed that level of support. The current system of amending the Constitution was designed to make sure it was never amended.
There were a number of options open to the Government. The most obvious was to simply scrap the Constitution and call a new Constitutional Convention. However, such a move would represent the very kind of radical discontinuity that the Confederal people were simply sick of. Another option would be to place all the necessary reforms in a single amendment on the assumption that enough people knew there had to be change that nearly everyone would vote for the entire package, even though no single provision could have commanded such a majority. However, this second option would have left the inherent deficiencies of the amendment process unaddressed. Instead, Mr. Ochiang decided to rely on the near universal belief that constitutional reform was needed and to amend the amendment process to make it possible. Such an amendment would be the only time that the original process would need to be used and it was also likely to only issue on which the sort of majority envisioned by the original provisions might be found.
Mr. Ochiang thus moved that Congress submit to the people a proposed constitutional amendment allowing the constitution to be amended by a vote of a majority of the people in two thirds of the Members provided that such a majority shall also constitute a majority of the total votes. Congress passed the measure and it was sent to the people.
On the day of the referendum, the people of 128 Members gave the amendment their overwhelming approval. Sonora alone was too close to call. However, if the amendment was defeated in Sonora, it would be defeated and, despite their overwhelming success, it was unclear that night whether constitutional reform would truly be possible or not. After a full week of counting and recounting, checking and double-checking, it became more and more apparent that the Sonoran results were unprecedented in exactly how close they were. In the end, it turned out that the referendum had passed, but only by a single vote.
Mr. Ochiang then began moving to get his other proposed amendments past. He determined that the next set of amendments would all be submitted to the people on the same day so as to avoid voter fatigue and set a date a month in the future to give himself and his government sufficient time to get them through Congress. The first proposal was for an amendment which would ban alliances or intergovernmental unions (excluding, of course, the Confederated Peoples itself) between Members and allowing any such unions already in existence one year’s time to fully transition. The second proposal was for the creation of a unicameral legislature (the Confederal Assembly) based upon proportional representation to replace the Congress of the Confederation. The next proposal was for an amendment creating a Confederal Council as the Government of the Confederation. This Council would consist of seven members each with a specific portfolio. Each member would be elected separately by the Confederal Assembly for a four-year term. The President and Vice-President of the Confederated Peoples would be elected from among the Council for concurrent one-year terms. The next proposed amendment concerned the Supreme Court. It did not change anything of substance regarding the role and function of the Court but it elevated the basis of this role from a statute to a constitutional provision, thus guaranteeing the independence of the Court from the legislature. The next proposal concerned the Head of the Commonwealth, enshrining in the Constitution his status as the living symbol of the free union among the Members, guaranteeing the respect duly accorded to such a position and, more substantively, giving him authority in dynastic, as opposed to intergovernmental, diplomacy and allowing him to play a more general role in diplomacy with the support of the legislature. The last proposal which effected changes to the structure of the government itself was one forbidding any person from running for re-election to any office they currently held, although they would be allowed to again run for the same office in later campaigns.
There were a number of options open to the Government. The most obvious was to simply scrap the Constitution and call a new Constitutional Convention. However, such a move would represent the very kind of radical discontinuity that the Confederal people were simply sick of. Another option would be to place all the necessary reforms in a single amendment on the assumption that enough people knew there had to be change that nearly everyone would vote for the entire package, even though no single provision could have commanded such a majority. However, this second option would have left the inherent deficiencies of the amendment process unaddressed. Instead, Mr. Ochiang decided to rely on the near universal belief that constitutional reform was needed and to amend the amendment process to make it possible. Such an amendment would be the only time that the original process would need to be used and it was also likely to only issue on which the sort of majority envisioned by the original provisions might be found.
Mr. Ochiang thus moved that Congress submit to the people a proposed constitutional amendment allowing the constitution to be amended by a vote of a majority of the people in two thirds of the Members provided that such a majority shall also constitute a majority of the total votes. Congress passed the measure and it was sent to the people.
On the day of the referendum, the people of 128 Members gave the amendment their overwhelming approval. Sonora alone was too close to call. However, if the amendment was defeated in Sonora, it would be defeated and, despite their overwhelming success, it was unclear that night whether constitutional reform would truly be possible or not. After a full week of counting and recounting, checking and double-checking, it became more and more apparent that the Sonoran results were unprecedented in exactly how close they were. In the end, it turned out that the referendum had passed, but only by a single vote.
Mr. Ochiang then began moving to get his other proposed amendments past. He determined that the next set of amendments would all be submitted to the people on the same day so as to avoid voter fatigue and set a date a month in the future to give himself and his government sufficient time to get them through Congress. The first proposal was for an amendment which would ban alliances or intergovernmental unions (excluding, of course, the Confederated Peoples itself) between Members and allowing any such unions already in existence one year’s time to fully transition. The second proposal was for the creation of a unicameral legislature (the Confederal Assembly) based upon proportional representation to replace the Congress of the Confederation. The next proposal was for an amendment creating a Confederal Council as the Government of the Confederation. This Council would consist of seven members each with a specific portfolio. Each member would be elected separately by the Confederal Assembly for a four-year term. The President and Vice-President of the Confederated Peoples would be elected from among the Council for concurrent one-year terms. The next proposed amendment concerned the Supreme Court. It did not change anything of substance regarding the role and function of the Court but it elevated the basis of this role from a statute to a constitutional provision, thus guaranteeing the independence of the Court from the legislature. The next proposal concerned the Head of the Commonwealth, enshrining in the Constitution his status as the living symbol of the free union among the Members, guaranteeing the respect duly accorded to such a position and, more substantively, giving him authority in dynastic, as opposed to intergovernmental, diplomacy and allowing him to play a more general role in diplomacy with the support of the legislature. The last proposal which effected changes to the structure of the government itself was one forbidding any person from running for re-election to any office they currently held, although they would be allowed to again run for the same office in later campaigns.