NationStates Jolt Archive


"America" to "Britainnia"?

Rossinnisskoii
31-12-2005, 03:17
The U.S. declines partnership in The Monarchy or Royalty thereof in full part, Canada takes the Opportunity in claiming Continental America for it's
own Crown and Monarchy since the U.S. has decided to use the Continental term "America" and "American" for it's own use, it deemed this fair. H.I.&R.M. included himself and has taken the title of King of Britainnian America for his own.
Steel Butterfly
31-12-2005, 06:11
You realize that it would be spelled Britannia don't you?

Regardless, taking over North and South America with any force, much less (lol) Canada under any circumstance, much less just stating it, is quite the godmod.
Tsaraine
31-12-2005, 12:20
There's no rule saying he can't claim Pan-America for his very own; there's plenty of people over in International Incidents who've done just that, through the various Earths there. And I'm sure his Imperial and Royal Majesty can call himself what he likes - he is, after all, a monarch. L'estat est moi, as they say.
Beth Gellert
31-12-2005, 15:52
I thought that they said, "l'état c'est moi".

Anyway, I must admit that from the initial post I can't quite figure-out whether this does indeed represent a union -by force or other means- of multiple American nations, or whether it means merely to indicate that Canada, having established for itself a native monarchy, has decided to refer to the Americas as Britainnia. I mean, the title King of Britainnian America seems to me indicative of the continued existance of a non-Britainnian America.

In short: Pardon?
Steel Butterfly
31-12-2005, 18:09
there's plenty of people over in International Incidents who've done just that, through the various Earths there.

Aye...there's somewhat of a different standard up here.