Hizaguchi
31-03-2005, 19:15
The rapidly spreading STD VODAIS has affected countless nations and, as such, I have noticed that many governments have chosen to exile their infected citizens from society. At first glance, this practice seems barbaric, but upon further inspection it may actually be the most humane approach to dealing with the situation. I think of it like this:
On one hand, we could spend taxpayer money to treat the ill and still run the risk of them irresponsibly infecting still more citizens. Depending on the severity of the disease (lethal? incurable?), this massive use of government funds will either slowly eliminate VODAIS or will simply slow its spreading.
On the other hand, we could simply exile the sick and wait for them to die, thus eliminating the disease completely. This approach is indeed cruel toward the ill, but it will spare countless otherwise healthy citizens from contracting the disease. This method has been effective in the past for dealing with diseases such as Leprosy and is even widely employed today by countries which restrict entry of infected individuals (this is the reason Rabies is nonexistant in Jamaica, for example). One could even make the argument that those who have contracted VODAIS have brought exile upon themselves through unprotected promiscuity. Nonetheless, this practice still seems cruel.
I am interested in how your societies have dealth with VODAIS, and how you view the morality of using internment camps.
On one hand, we could spend taxpayer money to treat the ill and still run the risk of them irresponsibly infecting still more citizens. Depending on the severity of the disease (lethal? incurable?), this massive use of government funds will either slowly eliminate VODAIS or will simply slow its spreading.
On the other hand, we could simply exile the sick and wait for them to die, thus eliminating the disease completely. This approach is indeed cruel toward the ill, but it will spare countless otherwise healthy citizens from contracting the disease. This method has been effective in the past for dealing with diseases such as Leprosy and is even widely employed today by countries which restrict entry of infected individuals (this is the reason Rabies is nonexistant in Jamaica, for example). One could even make the argument that those who have contracted VODAIS have brought exile upon themselves through unprotected promiscuity. Nonetheless, this practice still seems cruel.
I am interested in how your societies have dealth with VODAIS, and how you view the morality of using internment camps.