NationStates Jolt Archive


Need for a New Union

Foma Formitch
18-09-2004, 01:00
i hope i speak for more nations than my own when i say the united nations does not look out enough for the needs of a moderate right wing developed country. lets face it, un is ruled by a bunch of left wing bureaucrat delegates who control far too many votes and enact laws that may seem the most humane at first glance but on the long run will lead to severe economic depression and suffering for our populations.

only three days after joining un i find my nation being hit by resolutions to ban whaling, reduce greenhouse gases, increase sustainable energy sources. great things to strive for, but not every country can afford to follow through with such idealistic concerns when there are hungry, unemployed people that can live a life, raise a family, if only they were allowed to continue turning an obsolete species into lamp oil, cut down trees or mine coal.

we need to shatter the un monopoly on global organization. we need a union that will look out for our needs. one that encourages economic development ahead of humanitarian and idealistic ventures. possibly we can name it the formitch co-prosperity sphere. but the name isnt important. whats important is that the moderate (peace loving and democratic) right unite to form an alternative to the un, and protect ourselves against un's undemocratic and recklessly idealistic agenda to bankrupt and stagnate the world economy.

obviously there are questions needing to be answered before such an organization can be put on its feet. we should address them here.

(note: yes i know sometimes the un passes pro commerce resolutions, but they are few and far in between and i'm too used to msword capitalising for me)

foma formitch
Muktar
18-09-2004, 01:16
Or you can just quit the UN after meeting a UN nation with an all-consuming economy despite abiding to UN law when adressing issues.
Lords town
18-09-2004, 02:20
Are you saying that Nationstates is not a good organization to be a part of and what are your reasons?
Thanks,
Lords town
Muktar
18-09-2004, 02:37
Are you saying that Nationstates is not a good organization to be a part of and what are your reasons?
Thanks,
Lords townHe means NS's UN is not a good organization to be part of and should be replaced.
Foma Formitch
18-09-2004, 04:08
i know there are tons of economically frightening/all-consuming, whatever is better, nations that are part of the un. however, i still feel it is a economic handicap to be part of sometimes. i believe there are sufficient nations who would benefit from a more economic based union.

also, i'm not saying we should replace the un. just that an alternative union would give the diverse nations of the world a choice that may better suit their values and goals.