Rights of Man
07-04-2004, 06:16
Ladies and Gentlemen of THE BOARD,
I would like to have it brought to attention that the Rights of Man has noticed a trend in the United Nations. The United Nations is a large body politic and its decisions are final, however, I would like to know the general sway of the tides to be found in it. Though it is completely acceptable for some small nations to be swept away in the tide of political intrigue controlled by much larger, more endorsed nations, it is in the best interests of this nation to come to a better understanding before making a decision.
Is the United Nations a body composed completely of politically correct decisions taking a majority, or are there major issues in which a majority is not necessarily clearly defined? Understanding that views will not necessarily go the way the member would like them to, I would like to know if there is ever the possibility that membership is more affecting than affected.
I have noticed that when nations apply for the United Nations it is with the intention of bringing about there own personal proposals or endorsing a nation they are quite taken with. However, I fail to see the importance of either if majority elections turn out in a predictable fashion.
To be blunt, I am requesting knowledge from the broad base of nation states gathered by THE BOARD, of whether this functional group is of any interest, or whether a state is better off not being subjected to its mighty hand. Whether membership is rewarding enough to merit its application, or if the bureacracy and that which it stands for is simply a puppet for the politically correct majority.
Thank you for your input. The Rights of Man thanks all input upon this matter in the case of either decision, whether to apply or not. I hope that other nation states take the time to use this board as a way to come to their own decision for application. We are nation states that are proud, and we will not be swayed by simple advisements, because we are smarter than that and we believe in the meritocratic process. May the best argument win!
I would like to have it brought to attention that the Rights of Man has noticed a trend in the United Nations. The United Nations is a large body politic and its decisions are final, however, I would like to know the general sway of the tides to be found in it. Though it is completely acceptable for some small nations to be swept away in the tide of political intrigue controlled by much larger, more endorsed nations, it is in the best interests of this nation to come to a better understanding before making a decision.
Is the United Nations a body composed completely of politically correct decisions taking a majority, or are there major issues in which a majority is not necessarily clearly defined? Understanding that views will not necessarily go the way the member would like them to, I would like to know if there is ever the possibility that membership is more affecting than affected.
I have noticed that when nations apply for the United Nations it is with the intention of bringing about there own personal proposals or endorsing a nation they are quite taken with. However, I fail to see the importance of either if majority elections turn out in a predictable fashion.
To be blunt, I am requesting knowledge from the broad base of nation states gathered by THE BOARD, of whether this functional group is of any interest, or whether a state is better off not being subjected to its mighty hand. Whether membership is rewarding enough to merit its application, or if the bureacracy and that which it stands for is simply a puppet for the politically correct majority.
Thank you for your input. The Rights of Man thanks all input upon this matter in the case of either decision, whether to apply or not. I hope that other nation states take the time to use this board as a way to come to their own decision for application. We are nation states that are proud, and we will not be swayed by simple advisements, because we are smarter than that and we believe in the meritocratic process. May the best argument win!