The GDODAD
I wish to join the GDODAD. I know that they are the Global Dominion of Dicators Against Democracy and I know what they do. I also have my mind made up. I want to join the GDODAD and I what to know how I can do this.
Free Worlds League
28-01-2004, 23:49
:evil: gdodad sucks :twisted:
:evil: gdodad sucks :twisted:
Well, you've certainly backed up your amazingly enlightening two word sentence with some pretty informative emoticons! Gee whiz, that's sure to get people agreeing with you!!! :roll:
Anyhow, back on subject... I believe you have to talk to their leader, The Silver Turtle. He's not around much though, so maybe you should go through one of the other high ranking members, of which I don't have a list.
:evil: gdodad sucks :twisted:
No. The GDODAD is awesome. Use the right vocabulary word.
http://www.ebaumsworld.com/forumfun/positive8.jpg
MegaTokyo-3
29-01-2004, 00:21
I suppose the best question to ask at this point is: Why would you want to publically associate with one of the most hated entities in the world? I could see if you just came from out of nowhere as a GDODAD member, but to announce your intentions... I'm sure there are a few trigger-happy people out there who would love the chance to invade a GDODAD nation, particularly one who hasn't had time to make nice with the established GDODAD members. That's just my opinion, for what little it's worth.
The Global Domination of Dictators Against Democracy. An alliance built on the prinicible that Dictatorships are a more stable, and therefore more powerful, form of government.
Just so people know.
Now, uh... Dang, I forget who you'r supposed to TG to get in. It isn't TST. Ah, let me look it up and get back to you.
I suppose the best question to ask at this point is: Why would you want to publically associate with one of the most hated entities in the world? I could see if you just came from out of nowhere as a GDODAD member, but to announce your intentions... I'm sure there are a few trigger-happy people out there who would love the chance to invade a GDODAD nation, particularly one who hasn't had time to make nice with the established GDODAD members. That's just my opinion, for what little it's worth.Attacking ANY GDODAD member, be it this nation I have never heard of or someone as well known as The Brotherhood of Nod will bring dire consequences for the attacker.
Central Facehuggeria
29-01-2004, 00:29
GDODAD may be evil, but they protect their own. How many "good" alliances can claim that?
Most of the people against GDODAD really have no motive other than "Well, they're evil!". It's really pathetic, and sometimes I wonder if people against GDODAD are really nothing more than a dumbed down Justice League.
Post here: http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=95324&start=0
Barberosea will review and TG you if you got in or not. If he doesn't within a week, TG him.
GDODAD may be evil, but they protect their own. How many "good" alliances can claim that?
My organization, the Legion of Defence (LoD) protects others. However, the LoD doesn't claim to be good or bad and doesn't support just democraciess or dictatorships. The LoD defends.
i whish to voice my intentions to join GDODAD also.
long live the emporer
The Trojan Empire
29-01-2004, 00:49
GDODAD sucks, but so does the LAGD.
-- Priam
i whish to voice my intentions to join GDODAD also.
long live the emporer
Copiosa Scotia
29-01-2004, 00:56
GDODAD may be evil, but they protect their own. How many "good" alliances can claim that?
Uh... practically all of them?
GDODAD may be evil, but they protect their own. How many "good" alliances can claim that?
My organization, the Legion of Defence (LoD) protects others. However, the LoD doesn't claim to be good or bad and doesn't support just democraciess or dictatorships. The LoD defends.
I saw an instance where one of your LOD "protectorates" lost membership for a reason that a GDODAD member probably wouldn't lose membership.
GDODAD may be evil, but they protect their own. How many "good" alliances can claim that?
Uh... practically all of them?
But they abandon members a lot.
GDODAD may be evil, but they protect their own. How many "good" alliances can claim that?
My organization, the Legion of Defence (LoD) protects others. However, the LoD doesn't claim to be good or bad and doesn't support just democraciess or dictatorships. The LoD defends.
I saw an instance where one of your LOD "protectorates" lost membership for a reason that a GDODAD member probably wouldn't lose membership.
The Burnsian Desert broke several LoD rules. The Council of six nations ananamously voted him out.
GDODAD may be evil, but they protect their own. How many "good" alliances can claim that?
Uh... practically all of them?
But they abandon members a lot.
Name one instance.
Plenzonia
29-01-2004, 01:29
Why should non-GDODAD members care if Holy Mercenaries wishes to join them? If GDODAD members treat their nation and it's leaders as pawna, then it's their own fault and deserve it, if they protect him then they made a good short term choice.
I personally don't think the world as a whole have much to fear from GDODAD or members that might want to join them as it's a simple game of numbers. Centrist or "good" nations would almost always outnumber and outpower GDODAD nations, and if there is one thing that seems to bring unity to two differant ideaologies, it's a common enemy which happens to BE GDODAD. Even dictatorial communist or corporate nations could find GDODAD to be an offensive enemy.
If some of you people are just iching for a reason to launch a new war against them, just wait till they do something to another nation that DESERVES an attack and let the many, MANY nations line up to help you.
~*This message brought to you by an unknown Plenzonian bureaucrat*~
=][= Open Transmission =][=
+++ Subject: GDODAD +++
"I have been studying the several national alliances for quite some time, and the one that intrigues me the most is the Global Dominion of Dictators Against Democracy, or GDODAD. It seems that the nations of this conglomerate stand for everything Aigaithil Trithallos defies. A truly sadistic bunch they are, yet still they remain one of the most powerful alliances ever spawned. It seems whenever there is a major conflict between dozens of countries, GDODAD has something to do with it. Let it be known that Aigaithil wishes to have absolutely no relations with the GDODAD, or its allies."
High Prince Fulthanur
Copiosa Scotia
29-01-2004, 05:27
I personally don't think the world as a whole have much to fear from GDODAD or members that might want to join them as it's a simple game of numbers. Centrist or "good" nations would almost always outnumber and outpower GDODAD nations, and if there is one thing that seems to bring unity to two differant ideaologies, it's a common enemy which happens to BE GDODAD. Even dictatorial communist or corporate nations could find GDODAD to be an offensive enemy.
"Agreed. I'd go so far as to say that GDODAD is no longer capable of serious offensive action."
- Sophia Kahler, Secretary of Foreign Affairs
I personally don't think the world as a whole have much to fear from GDODAD or members that might want to join them as it's a simple game of numbers. Centrist or "good" nations would almost always outnumber and outpower GDODAD nations, and if there is one thing that seems to bring unity to two differant ideaologies, it's a common enemy which happens to BE GDODAD. Even dictatorial communist or corporate nations could find GDODAD to be an offensive enemy.
"Agreed. I'd go so far as to say that GDODAD is no longer capable of serious offensive action."
- Sophia Kahler, Secretary of Foreign Affairs
Let's all remember that Copiosa Scotia is also the biggest hot air bag when it comes to anti-GDODAD.
And so people know, GDODAD does protect its own, moreso than any other alliance. GDODAD is not "evil" that's just propoganda. GDODAD is an alliance of dictatorships, believing that democracy's are unstable and unable to make efficient progress. GDODAD is just hated because fools and warmongerers want someone to hate. In reality, GDODAD is probably the best alliance out there.
Copiosa Scotia
30-01-2004, 05:51
I personally don't think the world as a whole have much to fear from GDODAD or members that might want to join them as it's a simple game of numbers. Centrist or "good" nations would almost always outnumber and outpower GDODAD nations, and if there is one thing that seems to bring unity to two differant ideaologies, it's a common enemy which happens to BE GDODAD. Even dictatorial communist or corporate nations could find GDODAD to be an offensive enemy.
"Agreed. I'd go so far as to say that GDODAD is no longer capable of serious offensive action."
- Sophia Kahler, Secretary of Foreign Affairs
Let's all remember that Copiosa Scotia is also the biggest hot air bag when it comes to anti-GDODAD.
"Hot air? Our appraisals of GDODAD's situation have been unerringly accurate in the past, and I think my previous statement will prove to be more of the same. There is no reason for any nation to fear your alliance because, quite frankly, you lack the power and freedom of action to impose your policy on the rest of the world."
- Sophia Kahler, Secretary of Foreign Affairs
Crimmond
30-01-2004, 06:03
OOC: Stop hijacking and start another thread for a shouting match.
Copiosa Scotia
30-01-2004, 06:09
OOC: Stop hijacking and start another thread for a shouting match.
(OOC: This is not a hijack. The thread has already served its purpose - HM's question was answered - and it evolved into a general discussion of GDODAD before I even got here.)
Crimmond
30-01-2004, 06:19
(OOC: This is not a hijack. The thread has already served its purpose - HM's question was answered - and it evolved into a general discussion of GDODAD before I even got here.)OOC: Yes. I answered his question(under my alt nation) and has, as you said, served it's purpose. This discussion does not answer the question, which is the topic of the post, does it?
Then it is just as much hijacking as this conversation and should be taken to a sepereate thread.
Copiosa Scotia
30-01-2004, 23:48
OOC: Yes. I answered his question(under my alt nation) and has, as you said, served it's purpose. This discussion does not answer the question, which is the topic of the post, does it?
Then it is just as much hijacking as this conversation and should be taken to a sepereate thread.
(OOC: So, let me see if I understand. Any further discussion of any nature in this thread is hijacking unless it answers HM's question, which has already been answered. In other words, any post made in this thread will now either be hijacking or redundant?)
Crimmond
31-01-2004, 00:01
OOC: Yep.
Steel Butterfly
31-01-2004, 00:57
Steel Butterfly
31-01-2004, 00:57
http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=119785
A few posts down for a quick history of GDODAD 8)
Steel Butterfly
31-01-2004, 00:57
http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=119785
A few posts down for a quick history of GDODAD 8)
Steel Butterfly
31-01-2004, 00:57
http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=119785
A few posts down for a quick history of GDODAD 8)
Steel Butterfly
31-01-2004, 00:58
http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=119785
A few posts down for a quick history of GDODAD 8)
Copiosa Scotia
31-01-2004, 05:19
(OOC: Way to go, SB. Hijacking and redundant. ;)
I guess the only option left, then, is to let the thread die. Seems a shame to abruptly end a conversation just because it was hijacking a thread that isn't being used for anything else, but so it goes.)
Go ahead and hijack it. I'm not using it anymore.