NationStates Jolt Archive

The dust has been blown off of the Construction department of Foe Hammer Station, the largest Foe Hammer Shipyard in the Galaxy.
Foe Hammer Weapons, in conjunction with other numerous sources, has began construction of the first Foe Hammer Antigrav Vessel. This vessel, named the FHSV Grebennikov, will act as a multifunction carrier. This Carrier class will be about the size of the USS Nimitz, and will be armed with 8 Turbolaser batteries and one Main Mini-MAC Cannon. It will also feature four Archer Missile Pods, each capable of holding 30 Missiles. This vessel will levitate in the air using high-powered Antigrav devices and superconductors. This will allow the vessel to float in the Sea, cruise the skies and sail the void of space. While the Seas and Space are nothing new to Foe Hammer, a flying Carrier is certainly a marvelous achievement.

For those Stat-jockeys among us, there's a special section for you.

Eagle-class Multifunction Carrier Stats
http://www2.freepichosting.com/Images/154588/0.jpg
Length- 1,300 Feet Long
Width- 450 Feet Wide
Tall- 450 Feet Tall
Armament- Four Archer Missile Pods, Eight TurboLaser Batteries, One Scaled-Down Magnetic Accelerator Cannon, 20 Anti-Craft .50 Caliber Autocannons, Two Vulcan 50mm Autocannons
Craft Capacity- 90 (60 A-20 Firehawk-class Aero/Spacefighters, 22 F/B-30 Fighter/Bombers, Eight E-12 Sentry/Support Air/Spacecraft)
Crew Capacity- 4,206 (205 Officers, 2,800 Crewmen, 1,200 Aircrew, One Captain, One EI-822 Electronic Intelligence Vessel Operations Unit)
AntiGravity System- AP-100 Artificial Propulsion Anti-Gravity Unit
Power Unit- One Plasma Power Generator
Engines- Fusion Pulsejet Engines, model number classified (Space, Air), Nuclear Reactor (Sea)
Armor- Tubular Carbon Sheeting, Four inches
Launching Stations- Six (Four Fighter Stations, Two Bomber Sentry/Support Stations)
Price- $30,000,000,000

This vessel, with the full attention of the Foe Hammer Station Build crew, should be completed within a matter of possibly two, three, even four years. If this vessel passes all tests, it will then enter production.

OOC: Nice looking ship

bit more advanced than the one im designing.... :(

Thankees. *Gives Klonor a fresh-baked, soft Chocolate Chip cookie*

I based the design off of one of the prototype ships for one of the Klonor-Hammer customers. It's basically the same design, with modifications, but my carrier can kick his carrier's ass to hell and back :P

btw, nice ship

btw2: could i commision one of your weapons companies for weaponry on my ship being designed?(the threads on the first nationstates page somewhere...) and maybe engines too?

Sure. Whaddaya got in mind?

0MFG!!!11!!

Gr4vsh1ps are teh suXX0rs!!11!

c4nt w0rk e1ther, t0ttally 1mposs1ble LOL!!

gr4vsh1ps R fro n00bs 4nd p0eople wh0 d0nt under stand b4s1c phisycs!!1!11!

- Random Elite Newbian

well, an ionized zenon engine and basic laser weaponry(heard railguns are really inefficient) and well just add a few highpowered mechanical weapons of our own.

0MFG!!!11!!

Gr4vsh1ps are teh suXX0rs!!11!

c4nt w0rk e1ther, t0ttally 1mposs1ble LOL!!

gr4vsh1ps R fro n00bs 4nd p0eople wh0 d0nt under stand b4s1c phisycs!!1!11!

- Random Elite Newbian

And that is why, in Foe Hammer, citizens are required to take a computer course before being allowed to even touch a keyboard.

*predicts these will get lots of use*

*adds them to list of items for any spacefleet*

And that is why, in Foe Hammer, citizens are required to take a computer course before being allowed to even touch a keyboard.

omg!!!11!

R you tryng to dis me?!?!?!?11/!/1?

u r a n00b trynig 2 us3 gr4vships OMFG LOL!!!

u shuld noe bettr th4n make up BS!!11!! LMAO!!!!11!

- Random Elite Newbian

*predicts these will get lots of use*

*adds them to list of items for any spacefleet*
*Copyrights design and specs*

And that is why, in Foe Hammer, citizens are required to take a computer course before being allowed to even touch a keyboard.

omg!!!11!

R you tryng to dis me?!?!?!?11/!/1?

u r a n00b trynig 2 us3 gr4vships OMFG LOL!!!

u shuld noe bettr th4n make up BS!!11!! LMAO!!!!11!

- Random Elite Newbian
omg lolz u aer t3h n00b!!!11!11!1[shift+9]

u r t3h n00b adn u haev no lief!!1!1!!11

get a lief n00b!1!1!!!11!11!111!11!11!!!1111!11!!!!111

omg lolz u aer t3h n00b!!!11!11!1[shift+9]

u r t3h n00b adn u haev no lief!!1!1!!11

get a lief n00b!1!1!!!11!11!111!11!11!!!1111!11!!!!111

STFU n00b13!!!11!!11!!

ur sp4ce sh1ps are t0tal god mode 4nd t0taly n00bish LOL!!

- Random Elite Newbian

Who says railguns are inefficient? Railguns are plenty efficient if you design them properly; in space, the recoil may become an issue, but if you only have one cannon and you don't fire it like a machine gun, the acceleration on your ship's mass shouldn't be as great as the acceleration pushing in opposition to the reverse acceleration... That's assuming the cannon recoils into the ship and doesn't have a buffer system that prevents it from recoiling the entire ship per shot, of course. Nice ship, Foe Hammer, probably one of the most interesting-looking ships I've seen on NS.

---Post deleted by NationStates Moderators---

Who says railguns are inefficient? Railguns are plenty efficient if you design them properly; in space, the recoil may become an issue, but if you only have one cannon and you don't fire it like a machine gun, the acceleration on your ship's mass shouldn't be as great as the acceleration pushing in opposition to the reverse acceleration... That's assuming the cannon recoils into the ship and doesn't have a buffer system that prevents it from recoiling the entire ship per shot, of course. Nice ship, Foe Hammer, probably one of the most interesting-looking ships I've seen on NS.

i meant that if u shot them a lot, that they would use a lot of rails.

That's assuming the cannon recoils into the ship and doesn't have a buffer system that prevents it from recoiling the entire ship per shot, of course.

OMFG!!!11!!

u cant d0 th4t c0nservat1on 0f energi and m4tter

u need thrust 2 offs3t reco1l from teh ra1lgun

LOL!

- Random Elite Newbian

Eh, you use the same rail with a more sophisticated loading mechanism... It's no different than any other ballistic weapon...

Edit: Newbie-thing-whatever, quiet on the set. This is reserved for actual discussion, not idiotic discourse written hastily by what appears to be an "older" nation that just made a puppet nation to act like a retard with.

Who says railguns are inefficient? Railguns are plenty efficient if you design them properly; in space, the recoil may become an issue, but if you only have one cannon and you don't fire it like a machine gun, the acceleration on your ship's mass shouldn't be as great as the acceleration pushing in opposition to the reverse acceleration... That's assuming the cannon recoils into the ship and doesn't have a buffer system that prevents it from recoiling the entire ship per shot, of course. Nice ship, Foe Hammer, probably one of the most interesting-looking ships I've seen on NS.

Thank you. Took me about a day to just think up the idea.

And all Foe Hammer MAC guns work on the old Circa-1400 Rail system. Our MAC guns are mounted on large rails, with a buffer behind them. This means almost no recoil, maybe a slightly noticable shudder in the decks when fired en masse.

Newbie-thing-whatever, quiet on the set. This is reserved for actual discussion, not idiotic discourse written hastily

WTF?!?11!

i g4ve u a helpful sugestt10n why a ra1lgun c0uld n0t w0rk 4nd u attck me!?!

just stat1ng the f4cts s0 u all d0nt l00k l1ke complet n00bs LOL!!!

- Random Elite Newbian

MODALERT, even though the text search was disabled.

*predicts these will get lots of use*

*adds them to list of items for any spacefleet*
*Copyrights design and specs*

*Reorganizes two or three floors, redesigns some systems, declares the new design to be a "Definite, forward movement in the design" and patents the improved design in own name*
OOC:
just kidding, I'd get any from you.

We might sell these vessels to close allies, perhaps even larger Gravships, if they pass the tests, and if we're willing to let go of the things :P

The first of many Foe Hammer Antigrav Vessels has passed it's tests, and has entered active duty as the main Space/Naval/Air Force of the Nordlund system.

Foe Hammer will now begin mass production of 100 Antigrav Vessels, at a cost of $2,000,000,000,000. These vessels will play a major role in defense of the Nordlund system. Foe Hammer estimates a total of 200 GravCarriers by the time the Foe Hamme Armada decides to cease production. This is a major technological advance, as future Gravships will grow larger, a unique few possibly reaching up to 1km in length.

The first of many Foe Hammer Antigrav Vessels has passed it's tests, and has entered active duty as the main Space/Naval/Air Force of the Nordlund system.

Foe Hammer will now begin mass production of 100 Antigrav Vessels, at a cost of $2,000,000,000,000. These vessels will play a major role in defense of the Nordlund system. Foe Hammer estimates a total of 200 GravCarriers by the time the Foe Hamme Armada decides to cease production. This is a major technological advance, as future Gravships will grow larger, a unique few possibly reaching up to 1km in length.

Thats a tight looking ship would u consider selling me one?

Foe Hammer will now begin mass production of 100 Antigrav Vessels, at a cost of $2,000,000,000,000.

So now you not only godmode with physics, you godemode with economics as well.

Oh, I'd love to see what your GDP percentage expenditure on the military is. What is it. 10%? 12%? 15%? Oh my, perhaps it is 20%?

- Sovy K.

Foe Hammer will now begin mass production of 100 Antigrav Vessels, at a cost of $2,000,000,000,000.

So now you not only godmode with physics, you godemode with economics as well.

Oh, I'd love to see what your GDP percentage expenditure on the military is. What is it. 10%? 12%? 15%? Oh my, perhaps it is 20%?

- Sovy K.
In his defense: http://www.pipian.com/stuffforchat/gdpcalc.php?nation=Foe%20Hammer&defenseprovided=15&defense=15&militarybudget=15

And c'mon, its pretty much impossible to not at least bend the laws of physics when you're doing future-tech.

7.55% on the military? Heck, the US is only around half of that. That is quite a chunk of ones own GDP devoted to the military.

its pretty much impossible to not at least bend the laws of physics when you're doing future-tech.

Here is a thought, let us not do future tech and not look like a bunch of ubergankers. Oh, and for your information, what this guy is doing is blatently breaking the most basic laws in the most heinious ways possible, with such contraptions like gravships. If you constitute bending as a 120 degree break, then you would be correct.

- Sovy K.

The US does not have a tax rate of 94%.

If you don't like future tech, then ignore it like I do.

7.55% on the military? Heck, the US is only around half of that. That is quite a chunk of ones own GDP devoted to the military.

its pretty much impossible to not at least bend the laws of physics when you're doing future-tech.

Here is a thought, let us not do future tech and not look like a bunch of ubergankers. Oh, and for your information, what this guy is doing is blatently breaking the most basic laws in the most heinious ways possible, with such contraptions like gravships. If you constitute bending as a 120 degree break, then you would be correct.

- Sovy K.

oh come on, at least 10 other nations have done this before without complaint. stop badgering him for something that has been done before. this is a GAME in which you have FUN doing what you think would make it FUN.

The US does not have a tax rate of 94%.

I see your point.

If you don't like future tech, then ignore it like I do.

I do. However, when it feels like everybody and their dog is using future tech. And bad futuretech too, mind you, which is why I like to argue with people so they could at least do future tech right.

this is a GAME in which you have FUN doing what you think would make it FUN.

I find arguing with people on the designs of their space shuttles that make up there uberGank superfleets quite entertaining.

- Sovy K.

We would like to order twelve Eagle-class Multifunction Carriers

* $ 360 Billion Wired *

this is a GAME in which you have FUN doing what you think would make it FUN.

I find arguing with people on the designs of their space shuttles that make up there uberGank superfleets quite entertaining.

- Sovy K.

eh, well then its ok, but argue it a way that doesnt demean the guy. point it out to him, see if he agrees, and if he doesnt, ignore it and have fun watching what his reaction was.

eh, well then its ok, but argue it a way that doesnt demean the guy. point it out to him, see if he agrees, and if he doesnt, ignore it and have fun watching what his reaction was.

It is entirely up to him to ignore me. Other people do it, and I can tell you right now, it gets VERY difficult to argue with them. I even gave that suggestion to our friend Foe Hammer in the Moderation forum, where he filed a complaint against myself for 'griefing' him.

- Sovy K.

We would like to order twelve Eagle-class Multifunction Carriers

* $ 360 Billion Wired *

This is not a sale thread. This technology is highly classified.

7.55% on the military? Heck, the US is only around half of that. That is quite a chunk of ones own GDP devoted to the military.

its pretty much impossible to not at least bend the laws of physics when you're doing future-tech.

Here is a thought, let us not do future tech and not look like a bunch of ubergankers. Oh, and for your information, what this guy is doing is blatently breaking the most basic laws in the most heinious ways possible, with such contraptions like gravships. If you constitute bending as a 120 degree break, then you would be correct.

- Sovy K.

The moderators have ASKED you to drop the issue. I am asking you to please, STOP posting in my threads if you will do nothing but flamebait and harrass me.