NationStates Jolt Archive


Frightening GDP per capita?

Cav
27-01-2004, 06:17
I know that a lot of people use the Pipian website for calculating their GDP and what not. I personally don't like it because it limits a Frightening economy to a $35,000 GDP/capita.

Cav has had a frightening economy for about as long as I've had it (with an occasional drop to All Consuming or even Powerhouse :shock: )

I generally use $40,000 GDP/capita because my economy has been so good for so long, but I'm thinking of increasing it due to the fact that my nation has been around for almost a year at the same average production level per person.

My question is for those of you who don't use Pipian: what do you use for your Frightening (or otherwise) GDP/capita?
Cav
28-01-2004, 05:00
Hmm... this got moved out of Gameplay.

Oh well, bump.
Klonor
28-01-2004, 05:09
It might depend on what they list ast your main industry (Automobile manufacturing, information technology, etc.). SOme of them might ential higher pay than others.
Nianacio
28-01-2004, 05:41
I'd say $45-50,000 is the absolute limit. I think $40-45,000 is a good number for nations with Frightening economies.
The industries for the nation with the highest GDP per capita in the real world:
banking, iron and steel, food processing, chemicals, metal products, engineering, tires, glass, aluminum
Beth Gellert
28-01-2004, 05:42
Beth Gellert's long-term frightening economy is creeping up on US$50,000 per capita annually. When one considers that Luxembourg's economy is stronger per capita than you claim Cav's to be it really ceases to be all that frightening ;)

I don't know where to stop, really, as BG's economy is one of the 0.4% or so fastest growing on earth (so much for the weakness of socialist economics).
Santa Barbara
28-01-2004, 07:45
I generally figure somewhere around these ranges, 40 thousand to 50 thousand. However, I have my military budget fixed and everything else really revolves around that, so it doesn't really matter to me after a certain point.


I don't know where to stop, really, as BG's economy is one of the 0.4% or so fastest growing on earth (so much for the weakness of socialist economics).

Fast rise, hard fall, slow and steady wins the race, and all that. :P
Iansisle
28-01-2004, 08:33
I don't know where to stop, really, as BG's economy is one of the 0.4% or so fastest growing on earth (so much for the weakness of socialist economics).

(Well, that may be true, but we're still more liberal! Ha! Silly conservative communists ;).

I love winning most of all when things aren't contests.)
Beth Gellert
28-01-2004, 08:38
Damn that brief Stalinist experiment. Erase all laws from the period and still they aren't forgotten.
I ask you this- what would become of a typical Beth Gellen communist in Iansisle? Would your people's liberalism extend to not-beating-him-up?




And anyway there's more of us!



..At the risk of sounding too competitive I think I'm winning this conversation.

Hehe *sigh*
Iansisle
28-01-2004, 08:47
Well, the government wouldn't beat you up...a roving corporate head-cracking squad in search of unionist agitators might.

Hmm, I suppose this UN report goes by a very 18th century definition of 'liberalism.'
Cav
29-01-2004, 06:21
OK then, so the general consensus is that if I use $47,500 per person, then I will not be creating any NS accounting scandals.

Thanks everyone!