Esamopia
21-01-2004, 06:30
ESAMOPIA CITY, Esamopia -- Dozens of international reporters have gathered in this beautiful city for coverage on the most recent meetings of the Foreign Affairs Senate Committee hearings. At issue, the viability of the GDODAD alliance and its potential threat on the world.
The stunning announcement, made by the Chair of the Committee, read: "Anti-GDODAD alliances, combinations, and pacts should come to an end immediately. GDODAD has been proven to be benign and the international community should soon point the finger on such combinations, as they are the ones that are most likely to spark any conflict."
The official findings, numbering more than a thousand pages, paint a vivid picture of the failings of the GDODAD in meaningful action. Two volumes were devoted on the following core issues:
Volume 1: "The very combination of a group of dictators is inherently evil and all nations that value peace and security must resist such combinations at the highest of costs."
This volume demolished that assumption, citing a great deal of evidence. Scores of professors and distinguished experts in the field gave testimony that challenged the assumption, arguing that the GDODAD itself has not acted coersively against any nation in recent memory, has not attempted to use its overwhelming power and resources to invade hapless nations, and has only expanded due to the presence of powerful nations, in a completely voluntary manner. If anything, many experts alluded to the GDODAD in this respect as a guardian of world peace and stability, and argued that by combining in this manner, the individual nations that make-up the alliance are less likely to act in a hostile manner towards others. In fact, even the most psychotic of dictators is usually quelled by his/her membership in the GDODAD and is therefore less likely to commit individual acts of unbridled aggression.
Volume 2: This volume of the report was devoted to challenging another assumption, that of rumors between GDODAD and other powerful "malevolent" alliances combining to form a "superalliance" that would place virtually every NS nation under its mercy.
Again, the findings of dozens of hours of testimony and endless reports suggested a totally different picture. Given AMF's recent withdrawal from the Alliance it helped resurrect, many experts in geopolitics believe that the GDODAD is now more split than ever before and unlikely to come to a grand understanding with other nations if its own affairs are not in order. With some nations calling AMF's leader a "traitor" for his actions, while other members downplaying the decision to withdraw as "well-timed" and occuring in a non-crisis situation, the alliance's own leaders are uncertain how to react. Surely, argued many experts, this instability, or appearance of instability at the very least, would discourage the formation of any grand alliance to jeopardize humanity.
The reporters gathered here will broadcast live any other significant findings occuring at these hearings, though it is likely that such meetings will be adjourned after wrapping up some trivial questions.
The stunning announcement, made by the Chair of the Committee, read: "Anti-GDODAD alliances, combinations, and pacts should come to an end immediately. GDODAD has been proven to be benign and the international community should soon point the finger on such combinations, as they are the ones that are most likely to spark any conflict."
The official findings, numbering more than a thousand pages, paint a vivid picture of the failings of the GDODAD in meaningful action. Two volumes were devoted on the following core issues:
Volume 1: "The very combination of a group of dictators is inherently evil and all nations that value peace and security must resist such combinations at the highest of costs."
This volume demolished that assumption, citing a great deal of evidence. Scores of professors and distinguished experts in the field gave testimony that challenged the assumption, arguing that the GDODAD itself has not acted coersively against any nation in recent memory, has not attempted to use its overwhelming power and resources to invade hapless nations, and has only expanded due to the presence of powerful nations, in a completely voluntary manner. If anything, many experts alluded to the GDODAD in this respect as a guardian of world peace and stability, and argued that by combining in this manner, the individual nations that make-up the alliance are less likely to act in a hostile manner towards others. In fact, even the most psychotic of dictators is usually quelled by his/her membership in the GDODAD and is therefore less likely to commit individual acts of unbridled aggression.
Volume 2: This volume of the report was devoted to challenging another assumption, that of rumors between GDODAD and other powerful "malevolent" alliances combining to form a "superalliance" that would place virtually every NS nation under its mercy.
Again, the findings of dozens of hours of testimony and endless reports suggested a totally different picture. Given AMF's recent withdrawal from the Alliance it helped resurrect, many experts in geopolitics believe that the GDODAD is now more split than ever before and unlikely to come to a grand understanding with other nations if its own affairs are not in order. With some nations calling AMF's leader a "traitor" for his actions, while other members downplaying the decision to withdraw as "well-timed" and occuring in a non-crisis situation, the alliance's own leaders are uncertain how to react. Surely, argued many experts, this instability, or appearance of instability at the very least, would discourage the formation of any grand alliance to jeopardize humanity.
The reporters gathered here will broadcast live any other significant findings occuring at these hearings, though it is likely that such meetings will be adjourned after wrapping up some trivial questions.