New BattleCruiser.(PARTNERS WANTED,especially CSJ)
Eastern Detroit
21-12-2003, 03:27
I'm interested in developing a large Battlecruiser, something like a Kirov, no really large guns (nothing larger than 8"'s please) and really heavy armor. But multiple missile launchers. THAAD missiles in VLS along with the best Anti-ship and land attack missiles. I basically want a 60-70,000 ton armored Missile ship.
Of the council of clan
21-12-2003, 17:55
::BUMP::
Soviet Haaregrad
21-12-2003, 18:23
OOC:
I've designed a ship that might be along the line of what you want, but maybe too small:
CGN 21
HNS Gandalf class Heavy Nuclear Cruiser
Displacement (tons): 26 950 tons
Speed (kts): 38 knots
Dimensions (m): 240 meters (787'3") long overall
231 meters (760') long at waterline
30 meters (98') beam
8.5 (28')meters draft
Propulsion: 2 nuclear reactors, 4 screws
Crew: 500 + 30 air arm
Electronics:
Control Systems: Combat Information Center communications suite including satellite communications
3 Palm Frond Navigation
Radar: 1 LR-710 Top Plate 3D Air/Surface Search
1 MR-320 Strut Pair 2D Air/Surface Search
2 TR-909 Roland SA-11 Fire Control
2 MR-360 Cross Sword SA-12 Fire Control
Sonar: 1 LS-24 Bloodhound search and attack sonar [medium and low frequency bands]
2 MS-345 Bronza Yoke hull mounted Sonars
ECM: 2 ECM-556 Cloaker ECM system
Armament:
Missiles: 4 SA-11 Archer short range SAM system
3 SA-12 Adder medium range SAM system
1x128 SS-N-21 Sunburn cruise missile VLS cells
1x256 SS-N-21 Sunburn cruise missile VLS cells
Guns: 4x125mm bombardment cannon
8x40mm AA cannon
4x25mm GAU-25-5 CIWS
Torpedos: 12x535mm underwater torpedo tubes
Anti-Submarine Warfare: Udav-1 ASW system
Armor:
Belt: 4"
Deck: 3"
Conning Tower: 4"
Air Wing:
ASW: 4 SH-27(Ka 27) Killer Whale ASW helicopters
It's the same size as a Kirov, but with large VLS cells. The main advantage to guns is the cheepness of them to use. You can't just bombard a real enemy with endless cruise missiles(US vs. Iraq doesn't count, Iraq has nothing to shoot the missiles down with, if US vs. USSR happened that would be different)
Soviet Haaregrad
21-12-2003, 18:26
IC:
Dobrynin Shipyards OKB will offer technical support and shipbuilding facilities for this project.
Of the council of clan
21-12-2003, 18:27
I understand the difference. But i want something that strikes a balance between an Arsenal Ship and an Iowa. Heavy armor, long range, anti-air. Some large guns.
just wanted to point out the only flaw with cruise missels is that they use surface reconigition to figuer out where they are, and becuase there really isn't any noticeable landmarks in the desert, most of the cruiser missels followed rivers, and becuase cruise missels are rather slow (atleast comparitily) the iraq's just set up aa guns along the river and that was that. I don't remeber any stats... I just remebered it becuase it was surprising to me.
Soviet Haaregrad
21-12-2003, 18:30
I understand the difference. But i want something that strikes a balance between an Arsenal Ship and an Iowa. Heavy armor, long range, anti-air. Some large guns.
OOC:
I've also got a heavy gun/missile battlecruiser, a gun/missile battleship with some aircraft capabilities and a battleship/aircraft carrier hybrid, wanna see them?
Soviet Haaregrad
21-12-2003, 18:32
just wanted to point out the only flaw with cruise missels is that they use surface reconigition to figuer out where they are, and becuase there really isn't any noticeable landmarks in the desert, most of the cruiser missels followed rivers, and becuase cruise missels are rather slow (atleast comparitily) the iraq's just set up aa guns along the river and that was that. I don't remeber any stats... I just remebered it becuase it was surprising to me.
You mean Tomahawk cruise missiles are slow, Sunburns, which can be used for land attack, fly at like Mach 3 I think... *checks stats* Yes, mach 3.