NationStates Jolt Archive

Yeah, are there any alliances out there I can join, preferably socialist alliances, but I dont mind. Please post below if you want to offer me a position in your alliance or if you know an alliance I might be able to join.

join GDODAD...... :twisted:

What is GDODAD's policies?

DaKhiem (capital of the Choson People's Republic of Dra-pol) suggests that Soviet China II at least look into an Asian resistance movement of sorts, which is presently in its infancy.

http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=97669&highlight=

I posted there...thanks for the link. Are there any others?

what tech level are you?

What are your policies towards Taiwan?

Well we are trying to be at modern tech. But because we are poor at the moment we are stuck with 50yr old technology. We would raise our tech level however if we were to be sponsered.

What are your policies towards Taiwan?

We want Taiwan to be a part of the greater China, and we believe that the Chinese government should be allowed to enforce its government on Taiwan.

However, what the actually should do I believe is different. I think Taiwan should remain under the chinese flag, but should be able to set up a regional government who answers to the chinese government when the chinese government wants to intervene.

And what are your oppinions are China's unjustful, and greedy annexation of Tibet? And they're continued atrocities in Tibet, of killing and torturing Monks. Peaceful Monks! What are your opinion's on that?

OK, are we talking IC or OOC?

OOC: I actually hate the chinese government and their policies. If I were rich, I would actually personally help fund a rebellion movement.

IC: I support China

What are your policies towards Taiwan?

We want Taiwan to be a part of the greater China, and we believe that the Chinese government should be allowed to enforce its government on Taiwan.

However, what the actually should do I believe is different. I think Taiwan should remain under the chinese flag, but should be able to set up a regional government who answers to the chinese government when the chinese government wants to intervene.

OOC: No waving the nukes around?

Do not give into them Taiwan, you still have freedom!

They may promise Taiwan many things, to hopefuly unite Taiwan with China, but they will go back on their promis. China is no longer an honorable Country.

Dra-pol owes much to the honourable Chinese for their support against the imperialistic tendancies of the capitalist west. DaKhiem vouches for the honourable nature of the PRC.

Imperialistic West!? And what exactly do you think China is, unjustly annexation a country the size of Turkey!? An entire country, made up of NON-Chinese Pacifistic Monks!? What do you call that!? A Tea Party!?

See here (http://www.tibet.com/) for chinese cruelty to Tibet, and how China oppresses a country which they have no claim to, if you have any questions about Chinese Imperialism.

Spreading the revolution has never been Dra-pol's aim, but we applaud China's efforts to protect from capitalist corruption as much of the world as is possible.

-Central Directorature Diplomatic Channel 72ZG

Protecting Tibet from Capitalist Imperialism!? They only want Tibet to suppress Buddhism, which undermines their ideals, and as a strategic military defensive point.


Here's China's claims of Tibet:

The Chinese Communist Government claims it has a right to "ownership" of Tibet. It does not claim this right on the basis of its military conquest in 1949 or alleged effective control over Tibet since then or since 1959. The Chinese Government also does not base its claim to "ownership" on the so-called "Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet" which it forced upon Tibet in 1951. Instead, China's alleged legal claim is based on historical relationships primarily of Mongol or Manchu rulers with Tibetan lamas and, to a lesser extent, of Chinese rulers and Tibetan lamas. The main events relied on by the Chinese Government occurred hundreds of years ago: during the height of Mongol imperial expansion, when the Mongol Emperors extended their political supremacy throughout most of Asia and large parts of Eastern Europe; and when Manchu Emperors ruled China and expanded their influence throughout East and Central Asia, including Tibet, particularly in the 18th century.

The reader of China's White Paper "Tibet: Its Ownership and Human Rights Situation" will be struck by the scant attention its authors pay to Tibet's modern history in the decades before 1949. This is because from 1911 to the completion of the Chinese occupation in 1951, there is no evidence of Chinese authority or influence in Tibet which can support China's claim. In fact, the preponderance of the evidence shows precisely the opposite: that Tibet was to all intents and purposes a sovereign state, independent of China. This conclusion is supported by most legal scholars and experts on the subject.