NationStates Jolt Archive

Babel Newspaper

After the expelling of several thousand illegal Jewish settlers inside of GazaStrip earlier this month, the government has decided to follow what the people say and expel the rest.

It is thought that 3,420 Jews remain in GazaStrip. Most of them live in expropriated houses in Gaza City. These houses were given to them during the rule of the Zionist entity over the land of Gaza.

Security forces from the Mukhabarat Security Services and the Special Gaza Security Organization (SGSO) have begun taking the Jews and sending them over the border into the Zionist entity.

We, at the Babel Newspaper, are happy that President Yasser Arafat, may Allah protect him, has finally forced this scum from our lands.

Long live Yasser Arafat.
Long live Palestine free and Arab from sea to river.
Long live GazaStrip.

OOC: You may want this flame proof suit.

OOC:Well at least your not killing them and two your not messing with chistian holy sites otherwise, there are nations that would literally launch a crusade on you.

OOC: Crusades are fun.

"Bah."

~Cardinal Richelieu, who is too old to call a crusade against the Moslems.

Damn this Gaza Strip.

this is racist and you know it gaza strip. :evil: :evil: :tantrum:

Yes crusades are fun, but jews are ok too, man, guess what I may ge insane and try to attack you besides, I can't stand fanatical people except myself!!!!!!! :twisted: :D :) :( :o :shock: :? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen: :tantrum:

Yo, Catholicism is, considered, by me to be a very hateful religion, originally against gays, and also weird people like me :shock:

this is racist and you know it gaza strip. :evil: :evil:

Hello, Dumb and Dumberer. I'm a Catholic version of Iran. And I've banned several hundred religions, and I occasionally order people to be removed from the street and shot in order to keep the populace on its toes. Oh, and I ordered everyone of my country's prisoners to be shot so I could spend money on a larger military to crush do-gooders like you.

Is that rascist?

this is racist and you know it gaza strip. :evil: :evil:

Hello, Dumb and Dumberer. I'm a Catholic version of Iran. And I've banned several hundred religions, and I occasionally order people to be removed from the street and shot in order to keep the populace on its toes. Oh, and I ordered everyone of my country's prisoners to be shot so I could spend money on a larger military to crush do-gooders like you.

Is that rascist?i guess,but why you could have just let them stay. what did they do to you.Come on now you could have done something else to make money.

Because they broke the law. And according to my constitution:

Prisoners have no rights, and thus may be used for whatever purpose the Prince considers useful

Because they broke the law. And according to my constitution:

Prisoners have no rights, and thus may be used for whatever purpose the Prince considers usefulAnd which law would that be.Being a different religion.

"This is an interesting hybrid between a Flamebait fish and a warmongering hound"

Duchess Celesstriana Paelisi

"This is an interesting hybrid between a Flamebait fish and a warmongering hound"

Duchess Celesstriana Paelisiwhats that supposed to mean

OCC:mmmm...crusades in the holy land... :twisted:

OOC: Well, look. All of you need to stop posting unless you're going to post something in response to my POST.

This is a blatant intent of Flamebaiting and warmongering.

We condemn the bannishment of the jewish people. We urge you to stop remove expeling peopel becuase of their religon.

"We fully understand this action, and offer to accept all Jews into Roania. We can always appreciate good skills. It's why we allowed our Moslems to return after we exiled them."

"We fully understand this action, and offer to accept all Jews into Roania. We can always appreciate good skills. It's why we allowed our Moslems to return after we exiled them."Thank you

My fellow Gaza Strip nation.

We were going to expel the Jews from their own land, until we discovered that - even if we weren't too cowardly to do it - there is no Israeli occupation under international law.


Hague Professor of International Law: This Is No "Occupation"

Prof. Talia Einhorn writes that the Israeli presence in Yesha does not constitute "occupation," and moreover, that the U.N. Partition Resolution of 1947 is a "recommendation" and not obligatory.


Prof. Talia Einhorn, of the T.M.C. Asser Institute, an institute for international law in The Hague, writes that the Israeli presence in Yesha does not constitute "occupation," and moreover, that the U.N. Partition Resolution of 1947 that mentions a "new Arab state" is of the "recommendation" type and not the "mandatory" type.

In light of Prime Minister Sharon's recent use of the word "occupation" in reference to Israel's presence in Yesha, and despite his subsequent retraction, Arutz-7's Ruti Avraham quotes Prof. Einhorn's explanation as to why Israel is not an "occupying force" in Yesha:
"Up until 1948, Judea, Samaria and Gaza were a part of the British Mandate. In the 1948 War of Independence, Egypt illegally grabbed the Gaza Strip, and Jordan took Judea and Samaria, the 'West Bank.' Egypt did not claim sovereignty in Gaza, but Jordan deigned, in 1950, to annex Judea and Samaria. This annexation was not recognized by international law. The Arab nations objected to it, and only Britain and Pakistan recognized it - and Britain did not recognize the annexation of eastern Jerusalem. In 1967, after the Six Day War, these territories - which were originally meant for the Jewish Nation's National Home according to the Mandate Charter - returned to Israeli control." Einhorn adds that in 1988, King Hussein of Jordan rescinded its legal and administrative ties to Judea and Samaria.

"According to international law," Einhorn writes, "Israel has full right to try to populate the entire Land of Israel with dense Jewish settlement, and thus actualize the principles set by the League of Nations in the original Mandate Charter of San Remo in 1920. At that time, the mandate to the Land of Israel was granted to the British, and the introduction to the mandate charter states clearly that it is based on the international recognition of the historic ties between the Jewish People and the Land of Israel. Clause II of that mandate charges Britain with 'ensuring the existence of political, administrative, and economic conditions that will guarantee the establishment of the Jewish national home in the Land of Israel.'"

"Even the White Paper of 1922," she continues, "which restricted Jewish immigration to the land, emphasized the Jewish Nation's rights to the national home in the Land of Israel - while at the same time tearing away almost 80% of the mandate's area on the eastern side of the Jordan and giving it to Emir Abdullah."

Prof. Einhorn says that there is nothing in international law that requires a Palestinian state between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean - not even the UN Partition Resolution of Nov. 29, 1947. That resolution states that "independent Arab and Jewish States and the Special International Regime for the City of Jerusalem" shall come into existence in Palestine. However, Prof. Einhorn notes the widely-overlooked fact that the introduction to the resolution states specifically that it is merely a "recommendation" and nothing more: "[The General Assembly] recommends to the United Kingdom, as the mandatory Power for Palestine, and to all other Members of the United Nations the adoption and implementation, with regard to the future Government of Palestine, of the Plan of Partition with Economic Union set out below."

The fact that the Arab states did not accept the Partition Plan, explains Prof. Einhorn, voids the recommendation of any legal basis.

She further writes that Resolutions 242 and 338, which call for negotiations and a "withdrawal from territories" (not "withdrawal from the territories") captured in 1967, are similarly "recommendations." These resolutions were drawn up under the UN Charter's Clause VI, which deals with non-mandatory recommendations - as opposed to Clause VII resolutions, "which are mandatory, and which deal with a threat to world peace, such as those taken earlier this year against Iraq."


So, let's stick to murdering Israeli children on schoolbuses and bowing down to our Egyptian Fuhrer, Yasser 'Adolf' Arafat.

To the "nation" of Gaza Strip:

Stop believing those Jewish lies!

OOC: And cease flaming.

My fellow Gaza Strip nation.

We were going to expel the Jews from their own land, until we discovered that - even if we weren't to cowardly to do it - there is no Israeli occupation under international law.


Hague Professor of International Law: This Is No "Occupation"

Prof. Talia Einhorn writes that the Israeli presence in Yesha does not constitute "occupation," and moreover, that the U.N. Partition Resolution of 1947 is a "recommendation" and not obligatory.


Prof. Talia Einhorn, of the T.M.C. Asser Institute, an institute for international law in The Hague, writes that the Israeli presence in Yesha does not constitute "occupation," and moreover, that the U.N. Partition Resolution of 1947 that mentions a "new Arab state" is of the "recommendation" type and not the "mandatory" type.

In light of Prime Minister Sharon's recent use of the word "occupation" in reference to Israel's presence in Yesha, and despite his subsequent retraction, Arutz-7's Ruti Avraham quotes Prof. Einhorn's explanation as to why Israel is not an "occupying force" in Yesha:
"Up until 1948, Judea, Samaria and Gaza were a part of the British Mandate. In the 1948 War of Independence, Egypt illegally grabbed the Gaza Strip, and Jordan took Judea and Samaria, the 'West Bank.' Egypt did not claim sovereignty in Gaza, but Jordan deigned, in 1950, to annex Judea and Samaria. This annexation was not recognized by international law. The Arab nations objected to it, and only Britain and Pakistan recognized it - and Britain did not recognize the annexation of eastern Jerusalem. In 1967, after the Six Day War, these territories - which were originally meant for the Jewish Nation's National Home according to the Mandate Charter - returned to Israeli control." Einhorn adds that in 1988, King Hussein of Jordan rescinded its legal and administrative ties to Judea and Samaria.

"According to international law," Einhorn writes, "Israel has full right to try to populate the entire Land of Israel with dense Jewish settlement, and thus actualize the principles set by the League of Nations in the original Mandate Charter of San Remo in 1920. At that time, the mandate to the Land of Israel was granted to the British, and the introduction to the mandate charter states clearly that it is based on the international recognition of the historic ties between the Jewish People and the Land of Israel. Clause II of that mandate charges Britain with 'ensuring the existence of political, administrative, and economic conditions that will guarantee the establishment of the Jewish national home in the Land of Israel.'"

"Even the White Paper of 1922," she continues, "which restricted Jewish immigration to the land, emphasized the Jewish Nation's rights to the national home in the Land of Israel - while at the same time tearing away almost 80% of the mandate's area on the eastern side of the Jordan and giving it to Emir Abdullah."

Prof. Einhorn says that there is nothing in international law that requires a Palestinian state between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean - not even the UN Partition Resolution of Nov. 29, 1947. That resolution states that "independent Arab and Jewish States and the Special International Regime for the City of Jerusalem" shall come into existence in Palestine. However, Prof. Einhorn notes the widely-overlooked fact that the introduction to the resolution states specifically that it is merely a "recommendation" and nothing more: "[The General Assembly] recommends to the United Kingdom, as the mandatory Power for Palestine, and to all other Members of the United Nations the adoption and implementation, with regard to the future Government of Palestine, of the Plan of Partition with Economic Union set out below."

The fact that the Arab states did not accept the Partition Plan, explains Prof. Einhorn, voids the recommendation of any legal basis.

She further writes that Resolutions 242 and 338, which call for negotiations and a "withdrawal from territories" (not "withdrawal from the territories") captured in 1967, are similarly "recommendations." These resolutions were drawn up under the UN Charter's Clause VI, which deals with non-mandatory recommendations - as opposed to Clause VII resolutions, "which are mandatory, and which deal with a threat to world peace, such as those taken earlier this year against Iraq."


So, lets stick to murdering Israeli children on schoolbuses and bowing down to our Egyptian Fuhrer, Adolf Arafat (born Cairo).Now thats completely evil what if i were to go to where ever you live and destroy you.you would be really pissed

Silence, do-gooder!

Silence, do-gooder!are you talking to me

OCC: what the hell is going on...

OCC: what the hell is going on...read this thread

OCC: I already did...but that moron who is mixing real life quotations with ic ideas is really odd...

To the "nation" of Gaza Strip:

Stop believing those Jewish lies!

OOC: And cease flaming.

I can't help it. The Jews are controlling my brain with their orbital mind ray platform. The only way to stop them is by wearing a tin foil hat.

OOC: You started it.

To the "nation" of Gaza Strip:

Stop believing those Jewish lies!

OOC: And cease flaming.

I can't help it. The Jews are controlling my brain with their orbital mind ray platform. The only way to stop them is by wearing a tin foil hat.

OOC: You started it.

OOC: Go away. You're an idiot.

To the "nation" of Gaza Strip:

Stop believing those Jewish lies!

OOC: And cease flaming.

I can't help it. The Jews are controlling my brain with their orbital mind ray platform. The only way to stop them is by wearing a tin foil hat.

OOC: You started it.
Actually that is my orbital mind ray platform...sorry bout that

OOC: running with it... 8)

OCC: I already did...but that moron who is mixing real life quotations with ic ideas is really odd...

Oops... sorry Newtdom... must have been the stuff about 'Arafat' and 'Arab land from the Jordan to the sea' (the palinazi war cry) that made me think this wasn't entirely IC... my bad...

OCC: All good...all good...I dont really care...I didnt see much of an rp from this anyway...unless of course...CRUSADES!!!! hehe

CFP NEWSWIRE REPORT

Cretal to Evacuate Refugees

CRETAL CITY (CFP)-

The interim president of the Democratic Republic of Cretal, Vladimir Kurav, made a politically bold move today by announcing that the Cretalian Self-Defense Forces would be deploying transport aircraft to the borders of the Nation of GazaStrip, where Jewish refugees will be taken in and flown to refugee camps being prepared within Cretalian borders.

Political opponents denounced this move, citing the current state of political turmoil and military budget troubles. The DRC is preparing to undergo first-ever free elections after centuries of monarchy in November.