NationStates Jolt Archive

The New Muslim Alliance is on a recruitment drive to our recent lack of active members. The New Muslim Alliance (NMA) is an anti-Zionist and anti-racism alliance. To join you do not need to be Muslim or even have a Muslim population. You cannot be a Zionist or endorse Zionism.

In short the requirements are:

- You have to be willing to fight Zionists and prejudice nations.
- You must not be a Zionist or racist nation.
- You never have endorsed Zionism or Zionist countries.

Members:

Senior Members:
Al Anbar
Dyelli Beybi
Palestinian Lands

Regular Members:
Meldova
Western Germany

What exactly is zionism?

-Nik

This guy is already marked for death by several nations.

ooc why, fair is fair, their is a christian alliance, a jewish alliance, why nto a muslim alliance....its funny, especially when they are true blue, killer, i love Osama bin laden crazed fundamentalist never read the koran not actually-Muslims. i mean where else can we find villains we love to hate

You say you are anti-racism when you also say you are also anti-Jews?

We suggest Al Anbar to stop making these attempts to stir up conflict in the Middle East agauin, before they get crushed by the UE.

Foreign Affairs Ministry

You say you are anti-racism when you also say you are also anti-Jews?

We suggest Al Anbar to stop making these attempts to stir up conflict in the Middle East agauin, before they get crushed by the UE.

Foreign Affairs Ministry

The Muslim Alliance is not against all Jews. We are simply against those that wish to steal Arab lands, kill Muslims, and all of their supporters.

You say you are anti-racism when you also say you are also anti-Jews?

We suggest Al Anbar to stop making these attempts to stir up conflict in the Middle East agauin, before they get crushed by the UE.

Foreign Affairs Ministry

He said anti-Zionism not anti-Jew, there is a major difference.

Dyelli Beybi wishes to join this Alliance, Dyelli Beybi is around 83% Cyro Catholics (A Cardinal in Dyelli Beybi is claiming to be the Pope) and 10% Islamic the remaining 7% is Divided between Judaism, the Cult of Hat and Druidism.

Yes agreed,. though personally we do not get in to matters of Religion, this is not a matter of Religion, but a matter of opposing Idealogies. Zionism is a Belief that certain people should rule the earth, or the belief that an elite made up of Jews and Jewish supporters rule all events through banks and Media. I would suggest Leaving Al Anbar alone unless he wishes to harm someone else. It is fair enough to allow for alliances between people whom have similar world views, even when the Alliance is unpopular...this is an unbiased view. My biased view is simply....religion is a wasteful reason to go to war....dont do it for religion...do it for othre reasons, if you can find them [and you probably will haha]

INN News Feed: Iuthia’s Islamic community leader stated today:

“Al Anbar does not represent the whole Islamic community, and we condemn this so called Islamic nation for it’s war mongering that will claim many Jewish and Muslim lives if it is listened to. We suggest that all Muslim nations ignore them for their un-Islamic behaviour.

He said anti-Zionism not anti-Jew, there is a major difference.
Isn't "Zionism" similar, although different?

INN News Feed: Iuthia’s Islamic community leader stated today:

“Al Anbar does not represent the whole Islamic community, and we condemn this so called Islamic nation for it’s war mongering that will claim many Jewish and Muslim lives if it is listened to. We suggest that all Muslim nations ignore them for their un-Islamic behaviour.

We see this traitor of Saddam Hussein should be chased into doom.
The true Islamic community does not support this.

Omzian Islam Ogranization Boards

Members updated.

He said anti-Zionism not anti-Jew, there is a major difference.
Isn't "Zionism" similar, although different?


No 'Zionism' refers to the policies demanding the institution of a Jewish homeland put forward by men such as Balfur at the begining of the 20th Century. It has now come to be applied to the expansionistic policies of Israel (establishing settler projects in Arab areas etc). Zionism is a policy. Jew is a race of people.

He said anti-Zionism not anti-Jew, there is a major difference.
Isn't "Zionism" similar, although different?


No 'Zionism' refers to the policies demanding the institution of a Jewish homeland put forward by men such as Balfur at the begining of the 20th Century. It has now come to be applied to the expansionistic policies of Israel (establishing settler projects in Arab areas etc). Zionism is a policy. Jew is a race of people.
OOC: Ah, thanks for the clarification.

(OOC) You're welcome.

"Hmm. Looks like it might be time to join the Zion Pact. Just to make a point."

http://www.weirdozone.0catch.com/projects/nationstates/sirithil/sirithilnosfeanor.gifLady Sirithil nos Fëanor
Elentári of the Eternal Noldorin Empire of Menelmacar
Chancellor of CENNA
"If it is to be war between us, it shall be war to the knife and the knife to the hilt."
~Foreign Minister Duke Paolio, The Outlands
We Love the Iraqi Information Minister (http://www.welovetheiraqiinformationminister.com)
Clicky-clicky!

OOC: (Menel joining the ZP? Sounds great! (Even if the ZP is not oriented towards any relevant direction in this debate))

BTW, Zionism is the belief that Jews have a right to a national homeland in their homeland. It is nothing more than that in anything but the minds of those who wish to oppose it. It is a biased belief set specifically against the right of Jews to control their own lives in Israel.
IC:

It should also be known that this alliance will be dragged into many pointless wars of aggression that will wreck massive destruction. Al Anbar has previously threatened many countries without cause.

The Cycle is already begun anew (http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=83316)

OOC: (Menel joining the ZP? Sounds great! (Even if the ZP is not oriented towards any relevant direction in this debate))

BTW, Zionism is the belief that Jews have a right to a national homeland in their homeland. It is nothing more than that in anything but the minds of those who wish to oppose it. It is a biased belief set specifically against the right of Jews to control their own lives in Israel.
IC:

It should also be known that this alliance will be dragged into many pointless wars of aggression that will wreck massive destruction. Al Anbar has previously threatened many countries without cause.

The Cycle is already begun anew (http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=83316)

OOC: It is debatable whether or not Jews had the right to settle in Israel in the first place, especially considering the fact that they hadn't been there for something like 1,000 years. The fact that it was promised to them in the Bible does not to me give them the right to live there, disregarding the rights of the people already living in the area. HOWEVER, they are there now and as such the present situation should be looked at from where we stand now, not from the perspective of the Balfour declaration.

IC:

It should also be known that this alliance will be dragged into many pointless wars of aggression that will wreck massive destruction. Al Anbar has previously threatened many countries without cause.

The Cycle is already begun anew (http://www.nationstates.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=83316)
Of course. It is now truly a time to give these warhungry Al Anbar officials a lesson.

OOC: Sheesh, can't you guys just let him do his own thing? Don't ya'll think this would make out for an interesting RP if a Muslim alliance and a Jewish alliance were to go to war, maybe even start a world war? It's just boring for alliances in NS to go unnopposed. Unless I'm missing something, which I probably am, I don't see what the big deal is.

OOC: Sheesh, can't you guys just let him do his own thing? Don't ya'll think this would make out for an interesting RP if a Muslim alliance and a Jewish alliance were to go to war, maybe even start a world war? It's just boring for alliances in NS to go unnopposed. Unless I'm missing something, which I probably am, I don't see what the big deal is.

OOC: We aren't making the alliance unopposed, if that's what you are asking. This is already, an interesting (and in-depth already), RP :)
Of course - ICly, Al Anbar is already threatening a few of nations to war, and there's already been a few nation's attacking him.

To put this simply: Al Anbar attracted a lot of nations to attack him (and some, to defend).

Which is the reason why I'm nertual publicly in this.

OOC: This is already, an interesting (and in-depth already), RP :)


OOC: This is no doubt the something that I was missing, I didn't know that this had been going on for a long time, I thought it just started today. If Al Anbar plays his cards right though I think I might enter this on his side...

OOC: This is already, an interesting (and in-depth already), RP :)


OOC: This is no doubt the something that I was missing, I didn't know that this had been going on for a long time, I thought it just started today. If Al Anbar plays his cards right though I think I might enter this on his side...
OOC: Maybe I didn't made that very clear, sorry.
What I meant is that this alliance is new, but the actual RP of the conflict between Al Anbar and Western Asia/Ell/me/etc. is much more in-depth...

zionism isnt judaism its racism

OOC: Maybe I didn't made that very clear, sorry.
What I meant is that this alliance is new, but the actual RP of the conflict between Al Anbar and Western Asia/Ell/me/etc. is much more in-depth...

OOC: I know what you're saying, I'm just saying in this particular saga I'm leaning more towards the "bad guy".