NationStates Jolt Archive


The Debate

Xichuan Dao
04-01-2004, 19:57
--No Resolution Currently At Vote--

Lets debate.
04-01-2004, 20:02
I sure will. And believe me, I am master debater. :wink: :P
04-01-2004, 20:02
I sure will. And believe me, I am master debater. :wink: :P
The Global Market
04-01-2004, 20:19
--No Resolution Currently At Vote--

Lets debate.

I wholeheartedly support this non-resolution!

Heh, why not?
Zoricast
05-01-2004, 04:48
I sure will. And believe me, I am master debater. :wink: :P

Are you quoting part of that joke where it goes: You may be a cunning linguist but i'm a master debater. I was just wondering because i wasn't sure.
05-01-2004, 23:48
The Republic of Artemis and Persphone DOES NOT support this non-resolution, for the following reasons:

1. This is not a matter with which the UN should concern itself. This decision should be made by the rulers of the individual countries themselves, not by the UN.
2. My religion is against this, and because my religion is the one and only correct religion, I must put my foot down.
3. I am an ignorant bigot.
4. Just because! If this resolution is passed I'm quitting the UN and there's nothing you can do about it!

So there!
Xichuan Dao
07-01-2004, 03:44
The Republic of Artemis and Persphone DOES NOT support this non-resolution, for the following reasons:

1. This is not a matter with which the UN should concern itself. This decision should be made by the rulers of the individual countries themselves, not by the UN.
2. My religion is against this, and because my religion is the one and only correct religion, I must put my foot down.
3. I am an ignorant bigot.
4. Just because! If this resolution is passed I'm quitting the UN and there's nothing you can do about it!

So there!


umm...sure! why not?
should i actually submit that?
Letila
07-01-2004, 04:29
This proposal is far too right wing!

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kûk‡xenisi n!ok‡x'osi xno-k‡xek‡emi.-The state only exists to serve itself.
"Oppose excessive military spending, yet believe in excessive spending on junk food and plastic surgery to make all your women look like LARDASSES!"-Sino, when I criticized excessive military spending.
http://www.sulucas.com/images/steatopygia.jpg
I'm male. Note the pic of attractive women.
07-01-2004, 08:07
This proposal is far too right wing!

Choose from:

1. This is liberal trash... The US is a Christian country, because God wrote the Constitution. Don't let these guys destroy our families - think of the children! It's wrong and unnatural, and nothing is going to convince me otherwise! Shoot the commies!!

2. this is tipical ripublican rubbish these guyz are as much a waste of space as my typo-ridden poorly punctuated drivel

3. i wnt 2 mk a stupd coment abt sumfin i dont fuly undirstnd bt it wd tk 2 mny vowls

4. Hot dawg, I'm completely irrelevent!

5. I consider it my duty to publish an essay on this topic, because I'm so much smarter than anyone here that it hurts... (Thus starts another thousand words of tedious logic.)

6. I don't know what this is about and I don't care, because all I want to do is insult poster X! You're a banana after the monkey has finished with it! You are scum and you have a face only a bedsit in Blackpool could love!

7. <randomsmiley>

Not serious, you understand.

- Jordan
07-01-2004, 12:35
You may be a cunning linguist but i'm a master debater.

After which you can say "wow, but that's almost correct. All you have to do is remove the "de" ." :)
07-01-2004, 18:12
1. This is liberal trash... The US is a Christian country, because God wrote the Constitution. Don't let these guys destroy our families - think of the children! It's wrong and unnatural, and nothing is going to convince me otherwise! Shoot the commies!!


Praise the Lord! The rest of you are going to be forced to kick around beehives in the afterlife.
Catholic Europe
07-01-2004, 18:16
Catholic Europe is slightly confused as to the specifics of this resolution. :wink:
07-01-2004, 18:16
The Opressed Peoples of Nibbleton feel that this non-proposal is far to wordy. It needs to be reduced into a more concise format in order to remove several dangerous loopholes which we are sure would be exploited by any nation given the chance.

Major Johnson
Nibbleton